CCD vs. CWB
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB).
CWB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond. It was launched on Apr 14, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCD or CWB.
Performance
CCD vs. CWB - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCD achieves a 33.85% return, which is significantly higher than CWB's 12.83% return.
CCD
33.85%
-3.23%
12.46%
43.40%
13.84%
N/A
CWB
12.83%
3.76%
11.77%
21.32%
10.79%
9.21%
Key characteristics
| CCD | CWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.65 | 2.53 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.63 | 3.60 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.39 | 0.92 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.81 | 13.66 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.71% | 1.52% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.12% | 8.24% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.42% | -32.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.74% | -6.18% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between CCD and CWB is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCD vs. CWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCD vs. CWB - Dividend Comparison
CCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, more than CWB's 1.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund | 9.62% | 11.83% | 11.42% | 7.43% | 7.11% | 9.47% | 12.21% | 9.99% | 11.43% | 7.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 1.70% | 1.97% | 2.21% | 1.97% | 2.34% | 3.03% | 6.17% | 4.25% | 4.60% | 7.52% | 7.36% | 3.66% |
Drawdowns
CCD vs. CWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCD drawdown since its inception was -55.42%, which is greater than CWB's maximum drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCD and CWB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCD vs. CWB - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) at 2.65%. This indicates that CCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.