PortfoliosLab logo
CCCS vs. PRG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CCCS and PRG is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CCCS vs. PRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. (CCCS) and PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CCCS:

-0.53

PRG:

-0.34

Sortino Ratio

CCCS:

-0.65

PRG:

-0.13

Omega Ratio

CCCS:

0.92

PRG:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

CCCS:

-0.40

PRG:

-0.28

Martin Ratio

CCCS:

-0.97

PRG:

-0.74

Ulcer Index

CCCS:

15.68%

PRG:

23.76%

Daily Std Dev

CCCS:

27.33%

PRG:

52.50%

Max Drawdown

CCCS:

-42.72%

PRG:

-80.87%

Current Drawdown

CCCS:

-32.21%

PRG:

-55.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCCS:

$5.99B

PRG:

$1.16B

EPS

CCCS:

$0.01

PRG:

$4.87

PE Ratio

CCCS:

909.00

PRG:

5.92

PS Ratio

CCCS:

6.18

PRG:

0.46

PB Ratio

CCCS:

2.75

PRG:

1.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCCS:

$969.13M

PRG:

$2.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCCS:

$712.99M

PRG:

$1.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCCS:

$187.03M

PRG:

$1.49B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCS achieves a -22.85% return, which is significantly higher than PRG's -31.54% return.


CCCS

YTD

-22.85%

1M

0.67%

6M

-21.30%

1Y

-14.38%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PRG

YTD

-31.54%

1M

13.26%

6M

-39.88%

1Y

-17.93%

5Y*

1.54%

10Y*

-0.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CCCS vs. PRG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCCS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCCS is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCCS is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCCS is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCCS is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCCS is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCCS is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PRG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRG is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRG is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRG is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRG is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRG is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRG is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CCCS vs. PRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. (CCCS) and PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CCCS Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the PRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCCS and PRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CCCS vs. PRG - Dividend Comparison

CCCS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CCCS
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRG
PROG Holdings, Inc.
1.70%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.25%0.30%0.28%0.32%0.42%0.28%

Drawdowns

CCCS vs. PRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCS drawdown since its inception was -42.72%, smaller than the maximum PRG drawdown of -80.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCS and PRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CCCS vs. PRG - Volatility Comparison

CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. (CCCS) has a higher volatility of 14.63% compared to PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) at 10.73%. This indicates that CCCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CCCS vs. PRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. and PROG Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
251.57M
684.09M
(CCCS) Total Revenue
(PRG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCCS vs. PRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. and PROG Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
73.5%
31.8%
(CCCS) Gross Margin
(PRG) Gross Margin
CCCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 184.99M and revenue of 251.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.

PRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 217.52M and revenue of 684.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.8%.

CCCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of -10.70M and revenue of 251.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.

PRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.32M and revenue of 684.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

CCCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. reported a net income of -18.70M and revenue of 251.57M, resulting in a net margin of -7.4%.

PRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 34.72M and revenue of 684.09M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.