PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CCASX vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CCASXQQQ
YTD Return-0.20%9.03%
1Y Return10.57%37.37%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.45%11.70%
5Y Return (Ann)7.05%20.11%
10Y Return (Ann)11.05%18.68%
Sharpe Ratio0.642.35
Daily Std Dev17.67%16.21%
Max Drawdown-47.99%-82.98%
Current Drawdown-17.18%-0.10%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CCASX and QQQ is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CCASX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CCASX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CCASX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 11.05%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.68% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
539.34%
1,325.81%
CCASX
QQQ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Conestoga Small Cap

Invesco QQQ

CCASX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCASX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


CCASX
Conestoga Small Cap
Expense ratio chart for CCASX: current value at 1.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.10%
Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CCASX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conestoga Small Cap (CCASX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCASX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CCASX, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CCASX, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.01
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CCASX, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CCASX, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CCASX, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.001.96
QQQ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QQQ, currently valued at 2.35, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QQQ, currently valued at 3.20, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.20
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QQQ, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QQQ, currently valued at 2.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QQQ, currently valued at 11.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0011.47

CCASX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCASX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CCASX and QQQ.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.64
2.35
CCASX
QQQ

Dividends

CCASX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CCASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than QQQ's 0.59% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CCASX
Conestoga Small Cap
0.86%0.86%4.12%5.27%0.00%2.14%1.46%5.63%1.18%1.88%0.00%1.73%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.59%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%1.01%

Drawdowns

CCASX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCASX drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCASX and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-17.18%
-0.10%
CCASX
QQQ

Volatility

CCASX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conestoga Small Cap (CCASX) is 3.93%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that CCASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.93%
4.93%
CCASX
QQQ