CBZ vs. HWM
CBZ (CBIZ, Inc.) and HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CBZ in Specialty Business Services, HWM in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, CBZ returned 11.69%/yr vs 31.86%/yr for HWM. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBZ vs. HWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBZ achieves a -36.08% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 21.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CBZ has underperformed HWM with an annualized return of 11.69%, while HWM has yielded a comparatively higher 31.86% annualized return.
CBZ
- 1D
- -4.47%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -36.08%
- 6M
- -37.28%
- 1Y
- -55.21%
- 3Y*
- -15.18%
- 5Y*
- -0.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
HWM
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 28.10%
- 1Y
- 44.37%
- 3Y*
- 77.12%
- 5Y*
- 48.28%
- 10Y*
- 31.86%
CBZ vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBZ CBIZ, Inc. | -36.08% | -38.35% | 30.74% | 33.60% | 19.76% | 47.01% | -1.30% | 36.85% | 27.51% | 12.77% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 21.39% | 87.95% | 102.71% | 37.84% | 24.16% | 11.67% | 21.03% | 83.54% | -37.43% | 48.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBZ and HWM is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 1995 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CBZ and HWM shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CBZ:
$1.98B
HWM:
$100.20B
CBZ:
$2.45
HWM:
$4.31
CBZ:
13.18
HWM:
57.70
CBZ:
0.39
HWM:
0.98
CBZ:
0.73
HWM:
11.67
CBZ:
1.05
HWM:
18.15
CBZ:
$2.77B
HWM:
$8.62B
CBZ:
$353.31M
HWM:
$2.81B
CBZ:
$445.96M
HWM:
$2.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBZ vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank
CBZ
HWM
CBZ vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBIZ, Inc. (CBZ) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBZ | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.25 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 2.81 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 8.10 | -9.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBZ | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.06 | 1.46 | -2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 1.52 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.80 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.21 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
CBZ vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBZ drawdown since its inception was -96.13%, which is greater than HWM's maximum drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBZ and HWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBZ | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.13% | -88.30% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.69% | -15.89% | -51.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.64% | -19.41% | -52.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.64% | -23.19% | -48.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.64% | -64.81% | -6.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.62% | -9.12% | -54.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.04% | -31.02% | -20.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.16% | 5.49% | +36.67% |
Volatility
CBZ vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison
CBIZ, Inc. (CBZ) has a higher volatility of 15.40% compared to Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) at 11.35%. This indicates that CBZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBZ | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.40% | 11.35% | +4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.43% | 24.03% | +19.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.15% | 30.55% | +21.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.15% | 32.03% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.87% | 39.78% | -8.91% |
Dividends
CBZ vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison
CBZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBZ CBIZ, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
Financials
CBZ vs. HWM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CBIZ, Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CBZ vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison
CBZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBIZ, Inc. reported a gross profit of 226.02M and revenue of 848.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
HWM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
CBZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBIZ, Inc. reported an operating income of 196.45M and revenue of 848.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
HWM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
CBZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBIZ, Inc. reported a net income of 161.61M and revenue of 848.58M, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.
HWM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBZ and HWM have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBZ has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to HWM (11.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBZ dropped -96.13% vs HWM's -88.30%.
HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBZ and HWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer