PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBZ vs. AZZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBZ vs. AZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBIZ, Inc. (CBZ) and AZZ Inc. (AZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBZ achieves a -33.08% return, which is significantly lower than AZZ's 27.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CBZ has outperformed AZZ with an annualized return of 12.20%, while AZZ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.26% annualized return.


CBZ

1D
-2.65%
1M
4.98%
YTD
-33.08%
6M
-32.15%
1Y
-52.84%
3Y*
-13.87%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
12.20%

AZZ

1D
1.70%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
27.77%
6M
31.79%
1Y
47.68%
3Y*
54.80%
5Y*
22.11%
10Y*
10.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBZ vs. AZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBZ
CBIZ, Inc.
-33.08%-38.35%30.74%33.60%19.76%47.01%-1.30%36.85%27.51%12.77%
AZZ
AZZ Inc.
27.77%31.89%42.35%46.82%-26.09%18.10%5.34%15.65%-19.88%-19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CBZ and AZZ is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 1995

0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between CBZ and AZZ has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBZ:

$2.08B

AZZ:

$4.11B

EPS

CBZ:

$2.45

AZZ:

$10.51

PE Ratio

CBZ:

13.79

AZZ:

12.99

PEG Ratio

CBZ:

0.40

AZZ:

0.09

PS Ratio

CBZ:

0.77

AZZ:

2.50

PB Ratio

CBZ:

1.10

AZZ:

3.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBZ:

$2.77B

AZZ:

$1.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBZ:

$353.31M

AZZ:

$394.96M

EBITDA (TTM)

CBZ:

$445.96M

AZZ:

$564.26M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBZ vs. AZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBZ
CBZ Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
CBZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CBZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

AZZ
AZZ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBZ vs. AZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBIZ, Inc. (CBZ) and AZZ Inc. (AZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBZAZZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.02

1.62

-2.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.50

2.40

-3.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.28

-0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

2.84

-3.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.27

6.27

-7.53

CBZ vs. AZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the AZZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBZ and AZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBZAZZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.02

1.62

-2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.66

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.29

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.25

-0.08

Drawdowns

CBZ vs. AZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBZ drawdown since its inception was -96.13%, which is greater than AZZ's maximum drawdown of -77.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBZ and AZZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBZAZZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.13%

-77.87%

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.69%

-18.16%

-49.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.64%

-23.66%

-47.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.64%

-46.23%

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.64%

-68.02%

-3.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.92%

-8.16%

-53.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.04%

-31.98%

-19.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.00%

8.24%

+33.76%

Volatility

CBZ vs. AZZ - Volatility Comparison

CBIZ, Inc. (CBZ) has a higher volatility of 14.63% compared to AZZ Inc. (AZZ) at 9.24%. This indicates that CBZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBZAZZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.63%

9.24%

+5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.22%

22.54%

+20.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.99%

29.73%

+22.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.09%

33.55%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.84%

35.61%

-4.77%

Dividends

CBZ vs. AZZ - Dividend Comparison

CBZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZZ
AZZ Inc.
0.59%0.69%0.83%1.17%1.69%1.23%1.43%1.48%1.68%1.33%0.97%1.08%
CBZ
CBIZ, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CBZ vs. AZZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CBIZ, Inc. and AZZ Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
848.58M
385.10M
(CBZ) Total Revenue
(AZZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CBZ vs. AZZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CBIZ, Inc. and AZZ Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
26.6%
22.8%
Portfolio components
CBZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBIZ, Inc. reported a gross profit of 226.02M and revenue of 848.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

AZZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AZZ Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.59M and revenue of 385.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

CBZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBIZ, Inc. reported an operating income of 196.45M and revenue of 848.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

AZZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AZZ Inc. reported an operating income of 57.13M and revenue of 385.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.

CBZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBIZ, Inc. reported a net income of 161.61M and revenue of 848.58M, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.

AZZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AZZ Inc. reported a net income of 15.93M and revenue of 385.10M, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBZ and AZZ have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBZ has higher volatility (14.63%) compared to AZZ (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBZ dropped -96.13% vs AZZ's -77.87%.

AZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBZ and AZZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer