PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBT vs. LIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBT vs. LIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabot Corporation (CBT) and Linde plc (LIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBT achieves a 39.67% return, which is significantly higher than LIN's 20.67% return.


CBT

1D
0.53%
1M
1.29%
6M
29.49%
YTD
39.67%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
11.63%
5Y*
13.09%
10Y*
9.14%
ALL TIME*
8.83%

LIN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.02%
6M
13.96%
YTD
20.67%
1Y
9.87%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.49M$35.52M$45.36M
$969.40M$1.04B$1.15B

CBT vs. LIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CBT
Cabot Corporation
39.67%-25.68%11.25%27.63%21.38%28.40%-2.16%14.25%-31.07%
LIN
Linde plc
20.67%3.22%3.18%27.66%-4.39%33.39%25.88%39.04%-5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CBT and LIN is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.50

The correlation between CBT and LIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBT:

$4.72B

LIN:

$236.47B

EPS

CBT:

$5.85

LIN:

$15.20

PE Ratio

CBT:

15.64

LIN:

33.64

PEG Ratio

CBT:

0.85

LIN:

1.68

PS Ratio

CBT:

1.35

LIN:

6.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBT:

$3.61B

LIN:

$34.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBT:

$916.00M

LIN:

$15.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

CBT:

$773.00M

LIN:

$12.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBT vs. LIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBT
CBT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBT Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

LIN
LIN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBT vs. LIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabot Corporation (CBT) and Linde plc (LIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBTLINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.10

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

0.52

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.14

1.43

+0.71

CBT vs. LIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the LIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBT and LIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBT vs. LIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBT drawdown since its inception was -82.87%, which is greater than LIN's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBT and LIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBTLINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.87%

-32.59%

-50.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.82%

-19.18%

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.78%

-19.18%

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.78%

-22.82%

-25.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.66%

-6.49%

-12.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-5.38%

-15.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.06%

6.91%

+5.15%

Volatility

CBT vs. LIN - Volatility Comparison

Cabot Corporation (CBT) has a higher volatility of 9.49% compared to Linde plc (LIN) at 6.11%. This indicates that CBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBTLINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.49%

6.11%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.22%

14.02%

+10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.42%

17.95%

+15.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.72%

20.82%

+12.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.30%

24.01%

+11.29%

Dividends

CBT vs. LIN - Dividend Comparison

CBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than LIN's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBT
Cabot Corporation
1.99%2.69%1.85%1.88%2.21%2.53%3.12%2.90%3.04%2.02%2.22%2.15%
LIN
Linde plc
1.21%1.41%1.33%1.24%1.43%1.22%1.46%1.64%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CBT vs. LIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cabot Corporation and Linde plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CBT vs. LIN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cabot Corporation and Linde plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CBT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cabot Corporation reported a gross profit of 211.00M and revenue of 849.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.9%.

LIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Linde plc reported a gross profit of 4.26B and revenue of 8.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.

CBT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cabot Corporation reported an operating income of 129.00M and revenue of 849.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

LIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Linde plc reported an operating income of 3.26B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

CBT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cabot Corporation reported a net income of 73.00M and revenue of 849.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

LIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Linde plc reported a net income of 1.86B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBT and LIN have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBT has higher volatility (9.49%) compared to LIN (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBT dropped -82.87% vs LIN's -32.59%.

CBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBT and LIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer