PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CBT vs. LIN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CBTLIN
YTD Return32.50%11.42%
1Y Return42.87%13.98%
3Y Return (Ann)25.82%12.31%
5Y Return (Ann)20.83%18.46%
10Y Return (Ann)11.89%15.85%
Sharpe Ratio1.310.89
Sortino Ratio2.201.29
Omega Ratio1.271.18
Calmar Ratio2.391.18
Martin Ratio7.102.72
Ulcer Index5.91%5.03%
Daily Std Dev32.07%15.35%
Max Drawdown-82.87%-51.76%
Current Drawdown-6.68%-6.78%

Fundamentals


CBTLIN
Market Cap$6.33B$216.93B
EPS$6.49$13.19
PE Ratio17.3434.54
PEG Ratio1.832.55
Total Revenue (TTM)$3.99B$37.46B
Gross Profit (TTM)$961.00M$18.28B
EBITDA (TTM)$750.00M$15.74B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CBT and LIN is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CBT vs. LIN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CBT achieves a 32.50% return, which is significantly higher than LIN's 11.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CBT has underperformed LIN with an annualized return of 11.89%, while LIN has yielded a comparatively higher 15.85% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.41%
6.19%
CBT
LIN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CBT vs. LIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabot Corporation (CBT) and Linde plc (LIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CBT, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CBT, currently valued at 2.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.20
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CBT, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CBT, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CBT, currently valued at 7.10, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.10
LIN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LIN, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LIN, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LIN, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LIN, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LIN, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.72

CBT vs. LIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBT Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the LIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBT and LIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.31
0.89
CBT
LIN

Dividends

CBT vs. LIN - Dividend Comparison

CBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than LIN's 1.20% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CBT
Cabot Corporation
1.52%1.88%2.21%2.53%3.12%2.90%3.04%2.02%2.22%2.68%1.96%1.56%
LIN
Linde plc
1.20%1.24%1.43%1.22%1.46%1.64%2.11%2.04%2.56%2.79%2.01%1.85%

Drawdowns

CBT vs. LIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBT drawdown since its inception was -82.87%, which is greater than LIN's maximum drawdown of -51.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBT and LIN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.68%
-6.78%
CBT
LIN

Volatility

CBT vs. LIN - Volatility Comparison

Cabot Corporation (CBT) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Linde plc (LIN) at 4.65%. This indicates that CBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.94%
4.65%
CBT
LIN

Financials

CBT vs. LIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cabot Corporation and Linde plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items