CBLDX vs. MNHYX
Compare and contrast key facts about CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX).
CBLDX is managed by CrossingBridge. It was launched on Jan 30, 2018. MNHYX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009.
Performance
CBLDX vs. MNHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CBLDX vs. MNHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund | 0.35% | 6.04% | 7.11% | 7.71% | 0.66% | 7.44% | 3.59% | 3.50% | 1.67% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | -0.59% | 6.65% | 9.63% | 13.19% | -7.59% | 9.99% | 6.26% | 13.99% | -1.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBLDX achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than MNHYX's -0.59% return.
CBLDX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 4.95%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- —
MNHYX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 5.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CBLDX vs. MNHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBLDX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than MNHYX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CBLDX vs. MNHYX — Risk / Return Rank
CBLDX
MNHYX
CBLDX vs. MNHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBLDX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.43 | 1.43 | +2.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.92 | 1.91 | +3.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.03 | 1.33 | +0.71 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.34 | 1.49 | +3.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.86 | 5.83 | +18.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBLDX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43 | 1.43 | +2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.25 | 1.48 | +1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.54 | 1.80 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between CBLDX and MNHYX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CBLDX vs. MNHYX - Dividend Comparison
CBLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, less than MNHYX's 6.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund | 6.27% | 6.43% | 7.12% | 7.65% | 5.07% | 5.13% | 3.97% | 2.85% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | 6.89% | 6.95% | 6.38% | 6.66% | 5.93% | 7.93% | 4.98% | 6.63% | 5.26% | 5.16% | 6.49% | 5.60% |
Drawdowns
CBLDX vs. MNHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.15%, smaller than the maximum MNHYX drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLDX and MNHYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBLDX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -19.70% | +11.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.93% | -3.38% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.88% | -10.84% | +8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -1.69% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -1.57% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | 0.86% | -0.65% |
Volatility
CBLDX vs. MNHYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) is 0.65%, while Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) has a volatility of 1.62%. This indicates that CBLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CBLDX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.65% | 1.62% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.11% | 2.12% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45% | 3.68% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.57% | 3.67% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.83% | 4.15% | -2.32% |