CBAY vs. FNGU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. (CBAY) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).

FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.

Performance

CBAY vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. (CBAY) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CBAY vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBAY CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN	-35.43%	4.24%

Returns By Period

CBAY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGU

• 1D: 4.35%
• 1M: -14.02%
• YTD: -35.43%
• 6M: -44.05%
• 1Y: 17.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CBAY vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBAY vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. (CBAY) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBAY	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.37	—

Dividends

CBAY vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBAY nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CBAY	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-60.84%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-59.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-51.94%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-21.87%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	22.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBAY	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	24.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	44.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	77.71%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	80.80%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	80.80%	—