CBAY vs. FNGU
Compare and contrast key facts about CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. (CBAY) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).
FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CBAY or FNGU.
Correlation
The correlation between CBAY and FNGU is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CBAY vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
CBAY
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FNGU
1.41%
-10.92%
46.31%
75.35%
41.83%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CBAY vs. FNGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CBAY
FNGU
CBAY vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. (CBAY) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CBAY vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBAY nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CBAY vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
CBAY vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. (CBAY) is 0.00%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 21.46%. This indicates that CBAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.