CAVA vs. COP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CAVA (CAVA Group Inc.) and COP (ConocoPhillips Company) are both stocks. CAVA operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while COP operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past year, CAVA returned -12.54% vs 43.32% for COP. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CAVA vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAVA achieves a 22.25% return, which is significantly lower than COP's 29.31% return.

CAVA

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -20.58%
• YTD: 22.25%
• 6M: 31.70%
• 1Y: -12.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COP

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -2.60%
• YTD: 29.31%
• 6M: 29.99%
• 1Y: 43.32%
• 3Y*: 8.84%
• 5Y*: 18.99%
• 10Y*: 13.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAVA vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CAVA CAVA Group Inc.	22.25%	-47.97%	162.45%	-1.83%
COP ConocoPhillips Company	29.31%	-2.34%	-12.02%	13.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CAVA and COP is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023	0.04

Fundamentals

EPS CAVA : $0.54 COP : $5.90
PE Ratio CAVA : 133.06 COP : 20.21
PEG Ratio CAVA : 0.73 COP : 1.17
PS Ratio CAVA : 7.19 COP : 2.54
Total Revenue (TTM) CAVA : $1.18B COP : $58.31B
Gross Profit (TTM) CAVA : $216.81M COP : $17.02B
EBITDA (TTM) CAVA : $150.65M COP : $22.44B

Return for Risk

CAVA vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAVA

CAVA Risk / Return Rank: 33
CAVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
CAVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
CAVA Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CAVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CAVA Martin Ratio Rank: 33

COP

COP Risk / Return Rank: 78
COP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
COP Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
COP Omega Ratio Rank: 72
COP Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
COP Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAVA vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAVA	COP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	1.49	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	2.06	-1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.24	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	2.92	-3.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	6.62	-7.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAVA vs. COP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAVA Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the COP Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAVA and COP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAVA	COP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	1.49	-1.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.23	+0.08

Drawdowns

CAVA vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAVA drawdown since its inception was -71.11%, smaller than the maximum COP drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAVA and COP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAVA	COP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.11%	-84.55%	+13.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.65%	-14.90%	-37.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.45%	-10.23%	-42.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.02%	-25.48%	-4.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.25%	6.56%	+19.69%

Volatility

CAVA vs. COP - Volatility Comparison

CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) has a higher volatility of 15.19% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 8.85%. This indicates that CAVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAVA	COP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.19%	8.85%	+6.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.41%	22.77%	+18.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.29%	29.25%	+28.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.20%	32.72%	+26.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.20%	37.67%	+21.53%

Dividends

CAVA vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

CAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAVA CAVA Group Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
COP ConocoPhillips Company	2.77%	3.40%	3.35%	3.37%	4.23%	2.70%	4.23%	2.05%	1.86%	1.93%	1.99%	6.30%

Financials

CAVA vs. COP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CAVA Group Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CAVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CAVA Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 40.95M and revenue of 274.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.9%.

COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.

CAVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CAVA Group Inc. reported an operating income of 8.43M and revenue of 274.99M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

CAVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CAVA Group Inc. reported a net income of 4.92M and revenue of 274.99M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAVA and COP in my portfolio?

CAVA and COP have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAVA or COP?

CAVA has higher volatility (15.19%) compared to COP (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAVA dropped -71.11% vs COP's -84.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.