PortfoliosLab logo
CATO vs. ZUMZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CATO and ZUMZ is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CATO vs. ZUMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Cato Corporation (CATO) and Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-61.60%
-1.01%
CATO
ZUMZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CATO:

-0.69

ZUMZ:

-0.60

Sortino Ratio

CATO:

-0.72

ZUMZ:

-0.58

Omega Ratio

CATO:

0.91

ZUMZ:

0.93

Calmar Ratio

CATO:

-0.50

ZUMZ:

-0.38

Martin Ratio

CATO:

-1.25

ZUMZ:

-0.91

Ulcer Index

CATO:

36.34%

ZUMZ:

33.12%

Daily Std Dev

CATO:

67.96%

ZUMZ:

52.74%

Max Drawdown

CATO:

-95.26%

ZUMZ:

-88.06%

Current Drawdown

CATO:

-89.45%

ZUMZ:

-77.47%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CATO:

$49.14M

ZUMZ:

$235.79M

EPS

CATO:

-$0.97

ZUMZ:

-$0.09

PEG Ratio

CATO:

1.54

ZUMZ:

0.82

PS Ratio

CATO:

0.07

ZUMZ:

0.26

PB Ratio

CATO:

0.30

ZUMZ:

0.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

CATO:

$472.71M

ZUMZ:

$889.20M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CATO:

$148.77M

ZUMZ:

$303.04M

EBITDA (TTM)

CATO:

-$24.55M

ZUMZ:

$18.48M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CATO having a -34.36% return and ZUMZ slightly lower at -35.79%. Over the past 10 years, CATO has underperformed ZUMZ with an annualized return of -19.54%, while ZUMZ has yielded a comparatively higher -8.94% annualized return.


CATO

YTD

-34.36%

1M

-0.00%

6M

-59.43%

1Y

-46.48%

5Y*

-20.95%

10Y*

-19.54%

ZUMZ

YTD

-35.79%

1M

1.07%

6M

-44.20%

1Y

-31.27%

5Y*

-9.61%

10Y*

-8.94%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CATO vs. ZUMZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CATO is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CATO is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CATO is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CATO is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CATO is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CATO is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ZUMZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZUMZ is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZUMZ is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZUMZ is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZUMZ is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZUMZ is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZUMZ is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CATO vs. ZUMZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Cato Corporation (CATO) and Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CATO Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is comparable to the ZUMZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATO and ZUMZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.69
-0.60
CATO
ZUMZ

Dividends

CATO vs. ZUMZ - Dividend Comparison

CATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.28%, while ZUMZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CATO
The Cato Corporation
13.28%13.08%9.52%7.29%2.62%3.44%7.59%9.25%8.29%4.29%3.26%2.84%
ZUMZ
Zumiez Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CATO vs. ZUMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATO drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than ZUMZ's maximum drawdown of -88.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATO and ZUMZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-89.45%
-77.47%
CATO
ZUMZ

Volatility

CATO vs. ZUMZ - Volatility Comparison

The Cato Corporation (CATO) has a higher volatility of 23.17% compared to Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) at 19.47%. This indicates that CATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZUMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
23.17%
19.47%
CATO
ZUMZ

Financials

CATO vs. ZUMZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Cato Corporation and Zumiez Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
157.91M
279.16M
(CATO) Total Revenue
(ZUMZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CATO vs. ZUMZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Cato Corporation and Zumiez Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
29.2%
36.2%
(CATO) Gross Margin
(ZUMZ) Gross Margin
CATO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Cato Corporation reported a gross profit of 46.05M and revenue of 157.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.2%.

ZUMZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zumiez Inc. reported a gross profit of 101.03M and revenue of 279.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.2%.

CATO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Cato Corporation reported an operating income of -15.28M and revenue of 157.91M, resulting in an operating margin of -9.7%.

ZUMZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zumiez Inc. reported an operating income of 20.13M and revenue of 279.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

CATO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Cato Corporation reported a net income of -14.05M and revenue of 157.91M, resulting in a net margin of -8.9%.

ZUMZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zumiez Inc. reported a net income of 14.75M and revenue of 279.16M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.