PortfoliosLab logo
CATO vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CATO and QYLD is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CATO vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Cato Corporation (CATO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-84.13%
124.72%
CATO
QYLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CATO:

-0.69

QYLD:

0.29

Sortino Ratio

CATO:

-0.72

QYLD:

0.56

Omega Ratio

CATO:

0.91

QYLD:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

CATO:

-0.50

QYLD:

0.30

Martin Ratio

CATO:

-1.25

QYLD:

1.12

Ulcer Index

CATO:

36.34%

QYLD:

5.02%

Daily Std Dev

CATO:

67.96%

QYLD:

19.08%

Max Drawdown

CATO:

-95.26%

QYLD:

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

CATO:

-89.45%

QYLD:

-10.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATO achieves a -34.36% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's -6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CATO has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of -19.54%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.58% annualized return.


CATO

YTD

-34.36%

1M

-0.00%

6M

-59.43%

1Y

-46.48%

5Y*

-20.95%

10Y*

-19.54%

QYLD

YTD

-6.43%

1M

10.62%

6M

-5.30%

1Y

5.58%

5Y*

8.28%

10Y*

7.58%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CATO vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CATO is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CATO is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CATO is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CATO is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CATO is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CATO is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CATO vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Cato Corporation (CATO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CATO Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATO and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.69
0.29
CATO
QYLD

Dividends

CATO vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

CATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.28%, less than QYLD's 13.75% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CATO
The Cato Corporation
13.28%13.08%9.52%7.29%2.62%3.44%7.59%9.25%8.29%4.29%3.26%2.84%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
13.75%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

CATO vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATO drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATO and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-89.45%
-10.47%
CATO
QYLD

Volatility

CATO vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The Cato Corporation (CATO) has a higher volatility of 23.17% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 11.76%. This indicates that CATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
23.17%
11.76%
CATO
QYLD