CAT vs. ABBV
CAT (Caterpillar Inc.) and ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) are both stocks. CAT operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while ABBV operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, CAT returned 31.20%/yr vs 18.63%/yr for ABBV. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAT vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAT achieves a 60.51% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CAT has outperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 31.20%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively lower 18.63% annualized return.
CAT
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 60.51%
- 6M
- 54.15%
- 1Y
- 161.94%
- 3Y*
- 59.74%
- 5Y*
- 33.67%
- 10Y*
- 31.20%
ABBV
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
CAT vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 60.51% | 60.30% | 24.66% | 25.95% | 18.60% | 15.95% | 26.97% | 19.51% | -17.56% | 75.03% |
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | -0.77% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAT and ABBV is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013 | 0.27 |
The correlation between CAT and ABBV shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CAT:
$426.51B
ABBV:
$395.73B
CAT:
$20.07
ABBV:
$2.05
CAT:
45.62
ABBV:
108.68
CAT:
6.07
ABBV:
6.30
CAT:
22.86
ABBV:
14.39
CAT:
$70.76B
ABBV:
$62.82B
CAT:
$23.01B
ABBV:
$46.15B
CAT:
$15.31B
ABBV:
$17.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAT vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank
CAT
ABBV
CAT vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAT | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.17 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.74 | 1.24 | +10.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.95 | 2.77 | +36.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAT | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76 | 0.88 | +3.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.82 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | 0.73 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.74 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
CAT vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAT drawdown since its inception was -73.43%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAT and ABBV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAT | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.43% | -45.09% | -28.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -17.32% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.05% | -20.74% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.05% | -21.92% | -12.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.36% | -45.09% | +1.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -6.55% | +3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | -10.72% | -9.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 7.72% | -3.54% |
Volatility
CAT vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison
Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) has a higher volatility of 10.77% compared to AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) at 6.39%. This indicates that CAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAT | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.77% | 6.39% | +4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.35% | 17.89% | +9.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.31% | 24.33% | +9.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 22.91% | +7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.89% | 25.74% | +5.15% |
Dividends
CAT vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison
CAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than ABBV's 3.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 3.02% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 0.66% | 1.02% | 1.49% | 1.69% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 2.26% | 2.56% | 2.58% | 1.97% | 3.32% | 4.33% |
Financials
CAT vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caterpillar Inc. and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAT vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison
CAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.11B and revenue of 17.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.
ABBV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
CAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.
ABBV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.
CAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
ABBV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAT and ABBV have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAT has higher volatility (10.77%) compared to ABBV (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAT dropped -73.43% vs ABBV's -45.09%.
CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAT and ABBV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer