CASH vs. XQQ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO).
XQQ.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on May 3, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CASH or XQQ.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between CASH and XQQ.TO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CASH vs. XQQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CASH:
1.66
XQQ.TO:
1.47
CASH:
2.47
XQQ.TO:
2.00
CASH:
1.31
XQQ.TO:
1.27
CASH:
1.80
XQQ.TO:
0.26
CASH:
8.35
XQQ.TO:
6.90
CASH:
5.68%
XQQ.TO:
3.84%
CASH:
28.49%
XQQ.TO:
18.03%
CASH:
-83.66%
XQQ.TO:
-100.00%
CASH:
-12.18%
XQQ.TO:
-99.99%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CASH achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly higher than XQQ.TO's 0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CASH has outperformed XQQ.TO with an annualized return of 21.66%, while XQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 16.58% annualized return.
CASH
1.22%
-9.82%
28.23%
48.35%
15.11%
21.66%
XQQ.TO
0.66%
-1.29%
1.93%
26.26%
16.99%
16.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CASH vs. XQQ.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CASH
XQQ.TO
CASH vs. XQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CASH vs. XQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
CASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than XQQ.TO's 0.32% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH Meta Financial Group, Inc. | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.55% | 0.55% | 0.96% | 0.56% | 0.88% | 1.13% | 1.48% |
XQQ.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.43% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 1.30% |
Drawdowns
CASH vs. XQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASH drawdown since its inception was -83.66%, smaller than the maximum XQQ.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH and XQQ.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CASH vs. XQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) at 7.24%. This indicates that CASH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.