CASH.TO vs. SPLT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L).
CASH.TO and SPLT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CASH.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Nov 1, 2021. SPLT.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Platinum. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CASH.TO or SPLT.L.
Correlation
The correlation between CASH.TO and SPLT.L is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CASH.TO vs. SPLT.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CASH.TO:
12.41
SPLT.L:
0.33
CASH.TO:
47.38
SPLT.L:
0.63
CASH.TO:
14.24
SPLT.L:
1.07
CASH.TO:
69.75
SPLT.L:
0.19
CASH.TO:
671.19
SPLT.L:
0.82
CASH.TO:
0.01%
SPLT.L:
9.91%
CASH.TO:
0.34%
SPLT.L:
24.21%
CASH.TO:
-0.80%
SPLT.L:
-58.05%
CASH.TO:
0.00%
SPLT.L:
-36.90%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CASH.TO achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than SPLT.L's 6.36% return.
CASH.TO
0.36%
0.25%
1.73%
4.16%
N/A
N/A
SPLT.L
6.36%
-0.16%
5.98%
7.48%
0.24%
-0.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CASH.TO vs. SPLT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CASH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLT.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CASH.TO vs. SPLT.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CASH.TO
SPLT.L
CASH.TO vs. SPLT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CASH.TO vs. SPLT.L - Dividend Comparison
CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, while SPLT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 4.19% | 4.37% | 5.06% | 2.30% | 0.10% |
SPLT.L iShares Physical Platinum ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CASH.TO vs. SPLT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum SPLT.L drawdown of -58.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH.TO and SPLT.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CASH.TO vs. SPLT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) is 1.62%, while iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that CASH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.