CASH.TO vs. QQC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO).
CASH.TO and QQC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CASH.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Nov 1, 2021. QQC.TO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on May 27, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CASH.TO or QQC.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between CASH.TO and QQC.TO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CASH.TO vs. QQC.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CASH.TO:
12.38
QQC.TO:
1.81
CASH.TO:
47.15
QQC.TO:
2.43
CASH.TO:
14.18
QQC.TO:
1.32
CASH.TO:
69.41
QQC.TO:
2.54
CASH.TO:
667.85
QQC.TO:
8.94
CASH.TO:
0.01%
QQC.TO:
3.64%
CASH.TO:
0.34%
QQC.TO:
17.96%
CASH.TO:
-0.80%
QQC.TO:
-31.81%
CASH.TO:
-0.01%
QQC.TO:
-0.64%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CASH.TO achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than QQC.TO's 3.88% return.
CASH.TO
0.32%
0.23%
1.73%
4.14%
N/A
N/A
QQC.TO
3.88%
1.42%
18.38%
33.22%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CASH.TO vs. QQC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CASH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than QQC.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CASH.TO vs. QQC.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CASH.TO
QQC.TO
CASH.TO vs. QQC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CASH.TO vs. QQC.TO - Dividend Comparison
CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than QQC.TO's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 4.19% | 4.37% | 5.06% | 2.30% | 0.10% |
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.91% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
CASH.TO vs. QQC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum QQC.TO drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH.TO and QQC.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CASH.TO vs. QQC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) is 1.63%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that CASH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.