PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARZ vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CARZ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARZ achieves a 31.11% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CARZ has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 14.32%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


CARZ

1D
-0.24%
1M
-7.17%
6M
20.80%
YTD
31.11%
1Y
66.56%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
14.32%
ALL TIME*
10.15%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$535.60K$505.64K$494.01K
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

CARZ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
31.11%37.18%3.26%42.47%-31.25%18.09%54.66%11.39%-23.91%25.47%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CARZ and VOO is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2011

0.71

The correlation between CARZ and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CARZ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CARZ
VOO

Technology

69.1%
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
9.5%

Industrials

6.4%
8.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.7%

Communication Services

4.1%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.0%

Financial Services

-

11.4%

Healthcare

-

8.9%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Technology

CARZ
69.1%
VOO
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CARZ
16.3%
VOO
9.5%

Industrials

CARZ
6.4%
VOO
8.5%

Basic Materials

CARZ
4.2%
VOO
1.7%

Communication Services

CARZ
4.1%
VOO
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

CARZ

-

VOO
4.5%

Energy

CARZ

-

VOO
3.0%

Financial Services

CARZ

-

VOO
11.4%

Healthcare

CARZ

-

VOO
8.9%

Real Estate

CARZ

-

VOO
1.8%

Utilities

CARZ

-

VOO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARZ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CARZ
CARZ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CARZ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CARZVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.21

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.94

9.44

+1.50

CARZ vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARZ and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CARZ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARZVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.20%

-33.99%

-17.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.44%

-8.90%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.84%

-18.69%

-9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.30%

-24.52%

-15.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.20%

-33.99%

-17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.07%

-1.38%

-15.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-3.67%

-9.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.83%

2.08%

+3.75%

Volatility

CARZ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a higher volatility of 12.06% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that CARZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARZVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.06%

3.54%

+8.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.80%

10.10%

+17.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.88%

12.82%

+19.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.28%

16.93%

+12.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.77%

18.01%

+8.76%

CARZ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CARZ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
1.34%2.13%1.17%1.40%1.59%2.25%0.63%3.23%2.85%2.11%2.47%1.64%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CARZ and VOO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARZ has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARZ dropped -51.20% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.14% vs 14.32% for CARZ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 14.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.

CARZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.

CARZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CARZ and 0.03% for VOO.

CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARZ and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer