CARS vs. BATT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CARS (Cars.com Inc.) is a stock, while BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify. Over the past 5 years, CARS returned -0.68%/yr vs -1.19%/yr for BATT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CARS vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cars.com Inc. (CARS) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARS achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 2.90% return.

CARS

• 1D: 4.50%
• 1M: 21.62%
• 6M: 2.41%
• YTD: 0.98%
• 1Y: -0.08%
• 3Y*: -15.80%
• 5Y*: -0.68%
• 10Y*: —

BATT

• 1D: -3.40%
• 1M: -15.32%
• 6M: -6.82%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 1Y: 46.82%
• 3Y*: 3.71%
• 5Y*: -1.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARS vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CARS Cars.com Inc.	0.98%	-29.60%	-8.65%	37.76%	-14.42%	42.39%	-7.53%	-43.16%	-18.87%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	2.90%	59.70%	-13.93%	-7.05%	-32.25%	16.52%	44.43%	-2.40%	-42.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CARS and BATT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018	0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between CARS and BATT has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CARS vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARS

CARS Risk / Return Rank: 43
CARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CARS Omega Ratio Rank: 41
CARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
CARS Martin Ratio Rank: 44

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 49
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARS vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cars.com Inc. (CARS) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CARS	BATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.00	1.41	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	1.87	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.24	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.00	2.21	-2.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.00	6.90	-6.90

CARS vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARS Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARS and BATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CARS vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARS drawdown since its inception was -88.88%, which is greater than BATT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARS and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARS	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.88%	-69.38%	-19.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.03%	-21.24%	-23.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.77%	-47.65%	-19.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.77%	-61.98%	-4.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.06%	-21.24%	-40.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.97%	-34.47%	-14.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.80%	6.81%	+14.99%

Volatility

CARS vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

Cars.com Inc. (CARS) has a higher volatility of 12.46% compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) at 9.38%. This indicates that CARS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARS	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.46%	9.38%	+3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.92%	27.62%	+8.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.89%	33.39%	+13.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.65%	30.06%	+14.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.74%	30.78%	+25.96%

Dividends

CARS vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

CARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.80%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%
CARS Cars.com Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARS and BATT in my portfolio?

CARS and BATT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARS or BATT?

CARS has higher volatility (12.46%) compared to BATT (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARS dropped -88.88% vs BATT's -69.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.