CARK vs. BTHM

In the year-to-date period, CARK achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than BTHM's -0.07% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CARK has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than BTHM's 0.60% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the BTHM Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARK and BTHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BTHM's 0.71% yield.

The maximum CARK drawdown since its inception was -25.22%, roughly equal to the maximum BTHM drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARK and BTHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) at 6.09%. This indicates that CARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.