PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CARK vs. BTHM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CARKBTHM
YTD Return28.92%34.47%
Daily Std Dev18.21%14.31%
Max Drawdown-14.79%-26.54%
Current Drawdown-0.54%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between CARK and BTHM is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CARK vs. BTHM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CARK achieves a 28.92% return, which is significantly lower than BTHM's 34.47% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.33%
18.06%
CARK
BTHM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CARK vs. BTHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARK has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than BTHM's 0.60% expense ratio.


BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for CARK: current value at 0.54% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.54%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CARK vs. BTHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARK
Sharpe ratio
No data
BTHM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 3.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 4.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 4.96, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.96
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 21.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0021.28

CARK vs. BTHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

CARK vs. BTHM - Dividend Comparison

CARK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.


TTM20232022
CARK
Castleark Large Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.29%0.55%0.90%

Drawdowns

CARK vs. BTHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARK drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum BTHM drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARK and BTHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.54%
0
CARK
BTHM

Volatility

CARK vs. BTHM - Volatility Comparison

Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) at 4.13%. This indicates that CARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.07%
4.13%
CARK
BTHM