PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAPL vs. USAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CAPL vs. USAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPL achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly lower than USAC's 18.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CAPL has underperformed USAC with an annualized return of 10.12%, while USAC has yielded a comparatively higher 19.32% annualized return.


CAPL

1D
1.52%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
11.96%
6M
10.77%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
10.12%

USAC

1D
2.74%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
18.88%
6M
18.67%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
21.17%
10Y*
19.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAPL vs. USAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAPL
CrossAmerica Partners LP
11.96%2.89%6.27%26.71%14.99%22.91%9.01%43.57%-33.07%3.68%
USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
18.88%6.38%12.67%28.80%25.91%45.90%-10.09%57.91%-11.29%8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CAPL and USAC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2013

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAPL:

$841.49M

USAC:

$3.76B

EPS

CAPL:

$1.54

USAC:

$1.01

PE Ratio

CAPL:

14.22

USAC:

25.92

PEG Ratio

CAPL:

0.27

USAC:

0.41

PS Ratio

CAPL:

0.18

USAC:

3.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAPL:

$4.62B

USAC:

$1.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAPL:

$393.28M

USAC:

$433.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

CAPL:

$235.35M

USAC:

$537.51M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAPL vs. USAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPL
CAPL Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

USAC
USAC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
USAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPL vs. USAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAPLUSACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.12

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

0.93

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

3.39

-0.80

CAPL vs. USAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the USAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPL and USAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAPL vs. USAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPL drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, smaller than the maximum USAC drawdown of -78.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPL and USAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAPLUSACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.32%

-78.96%

+9.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

-17.29%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.25%

-24.35%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.80%

-24.39%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.92%

-78.96%

+12.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

-13.33%

+8.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.55%

-12.71%

-3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

4.73%

+0.41%

Volatility

CAPL vs. USAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is 6.85%, while USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that CAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAPLUSACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.85%

10.20%

-3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.43%

19.17%

-2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.67%

25.88%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.25%

28.51%

-3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.69%

42.81%

-2.12%

Dividends

CAPL vs. USAC - Dividend Comparison

CAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.56%, more than USAC's 8.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAPL
CrossAmerica Partners LP
9.56%10.19%9.55%9.21%10.59%11.02%12.23%11.63%15.55%10.44%9.53%8.60%
USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
8.00%9.13%8.91%9.20%10.75%12.03%15.44%11.58%16.18%12.70%12.14%18.06%

Financials

CAPL vs. USAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CrossAmerica Partners LP and USA Compression Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B202220232024202520260
331.28M
(CAPL) Total Revenue
(USAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CAPL and USAC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAC has higher volatility (10.20%) compared to CAPL (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAPL dropped -69.32% vs USAC's -78.96%.

USAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAPL and USAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer