CAPE vs. IWY
CAPE (DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF) and IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAPE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while IWY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. CAPE is actively managed, while IWY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAPE returned 10.41%/yr vs 19.65%/yr for IWY. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CAPE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWY.
Performance
CAPE vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's -0.03% return.
CAPE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.75%
IWY
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -3.97%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 8.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- 18.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $508.60K | $475.70K | $946.02K | |
| $127.32M | $104.93M | $113.90M |
CAPE vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPE DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF | 2.29% | 9.10% | 14.40% | 27.65% | -15.28% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | -0.03% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -23.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAPE and IWY is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2022 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CAPE and IWY has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CAPE vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAPE
IWY
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
CAPE
IWY
Real Estate
CAPE
IWY
Consumer Defensive
CAPE
IWY
Financial Services
CAPE
IWY
Healthcare
CAPE
IWY
Technology
CAPE
IWY
Basic Materials
CAPE
IWY
Consumer Cyclical
CAPE
IWY
Industrials
CAPE
IWY
Energy
CAPE
-
IWY
Utilities
CAPE
-
IWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAPE vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank
CAPE
IWY
CAPE vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF (CAPE) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAPE | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.52 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 1.50 | +0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAPE vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum IWY drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and IWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAPE | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.07% | -32.68% | +10.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -16.63% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.32% | -23.22% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -8.44% | +7.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -4.76% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 5.70% | -2.96% |
Volatility
CAPE vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF (CAPE) is 4.59%, while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that CAPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAPE | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 6.91% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 14.24% | -4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 17.75% | -6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 21.81% | -4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 21.13% | -4.28% |
CAPE vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAPE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAPE vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than IWY's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPE DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF | 1.37% | 1.39% | 1.23% | 1.01% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAPE and IWY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWY has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to CAPE (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAPE dropped -22.07% vs IWY's -32.68%.
On 3-year performance, IWY leads with 19.65% vs 10.41% for CAPE. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CAPE has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.65% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPE.
CAPE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.36% for IWY.
CAPE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CAPE and 0.20% for IWY.
CAPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAPE and IWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer