PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CAP.PA vs. CTSH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CAP.PACTSH
YTD Return-11.49%9.54%
1Y Return-3.13%26.49%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.69%1.51%
5Y Return (Ann)10.77%6.90%
10Y Return (Ann)13.12%5.44%
Sharpe Ratio-0.261.30
Sortino Ratio-0.211.94
Omega Ratio0.971.23
Calmar Ratio-0.190.92
Martin Ratio-0.472.99
Ulcer Index12.84%8.68%
Daily Std Dev23.12%19.99%
Max Drawdown-96.22%-71.38%
Current Drawdown-30.17%-8.48%

Fundamentals


CAP.PACTSH
Market Cap€27.53B$40.53B
EPS€9.54$4.52
PE Ratio17.2318.08
PEG Ratio2.371.34
Total Revenue (TTM)€22.23B$19.41B
Gross Profit (TTM)€5.80B$6.55B
EBITDA (TTM)€3.26B$3.43B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CAP.PA and CTSH is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CAP.PA achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly lower than CTSH's 9.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CAP.PA has outperformed CTSH with an annualized return of 13.12%, while CTSH has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-20.75%
21.59%
CAP.PA
CTSH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capgemini SE (CAP.PA) and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAP.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CAP.PA, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CAP.PA, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CAP.PA, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CAP.PA, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CAP.PA, currently valued at -0.64, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.64
CTSH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTSH, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.90
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTSH, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CTSH, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTSH, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.63
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CTSH, currently valued at 2.01, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.01

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAP.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the CTSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAP.PA and CTSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.35
0.90
CAP.PA
CTSH

Dividends

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Dividend Comparison

CAP.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than CTSH's 1.46% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CAP.PA
Capgemini SE
2.07%1.72%1.54%0.90%1.06%1.56%1.96%1.57%1.68%1.40%1.85%2.04%
CTSH
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
1.46%1.54%1.89%1.08%1.07%1.29%1.26%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAP.PA drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, which is greater than CTSH's maximum drawdown of -71.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAP.PA and CTSH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-28.51%
-8.48%
CAP.PA
CTSH

Volatility

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Volatility Comparison

Capgemini SE (CAP.PA) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) at 6.96%. This indicates that CAP.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.32%
6.96%
CAP.PA
CTSH

Financials

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Capgemini SE and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. CAP.PA values in EUR, CTSH values in USD