PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAP.PA vs. CTSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Capgemini SE (CAP.PA) and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CAP.PA is traded in EUR, while CTSH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CTSH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAP.PA achieves a -29.08% return, which is significantly higher than CTSH's -33.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CAP.PA has outperformed CTSH with an annualized return of 2.98%, while CTSH has yielded a comparatively lower -0.05% annualized return.


CAP.PA

1D
-3.04%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
-29.08%
6M
-26.36%
1Y
-30.90%
3Y*
-14.48%
5Y*
-6.36%
10Y*
2.98%

CTSH

1D
-2.75%
1M
4.65%
YTD
-33.96%
6M
-31.27%
1Y
-33.33%
3Y*
-6.55%
5Y*
-3.15%
10Y*
-0.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAP.PA
Capgemini SE
-29.08%-7.98%-14.83%23.58%-26.66%72.15%18.14%27.68%-10.91%25.46%
CTSH
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
-33.96%-3.34%10.28%30.35%-30.48%17.84%22.89%1.16%-5.42%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CAP.PA and CTSH is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAP.PA vs. CTSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAP.PA
CAP.PA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CAP.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAP.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAP.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CAP.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAP.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

CTSH
CTSH Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
CTSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTSH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
CTSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTSH Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capgemini SE (CAP.PA) and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAP.PACTSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.82

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

-0.71

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

-1.63

+0.25

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAP.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is comparable to the CTSH Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAP.PA and CTSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAP.PACTSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

-1.02

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

-0.12

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

-0.00

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.22

-0.10

Drawdowns

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAP.PA drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, which is greater than CTSH's maximum drawdown of -61.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAP.PA and CTSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAP.PACTSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.22%

-61.13%

-35.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.65%

-47.02%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.89%

-53.64%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.89%

-53.64%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.89%

-53.64%

-2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.15%

-45.15%

-11.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.85%

-15.77%

-42.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.42%

20.53%

+1.89%

Volatility

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capgemini SE (CAP.PA) is 12.60%, while Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) has a volatility of 14.23%. This indicates that CAP.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAP.PACTSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.60%

14.23%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.80%

27.70%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.07%

32.71%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.55%

27.21%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.34%

28.99%

+0.35%

Dividends

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Dividend Comparison

CAP.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than CTSH's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAP.PA
Capgemini SE
3.48%2.39%2.15%1.72%1.54%0.90%1.06%1.56%1.96%1.57%1.68%1.40%
CTSH
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
2.39%1.49%1.56%1.54%1.89%1.08%1.07%1.29%1.26%0.63%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CAP.PA vs. CTSH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Capgemini SE and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. CAP.PA values in EUR, CTSH values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CAP.PA and CTSH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAP.PA and CTSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer