PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAN vs. SPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CAN vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canaan Inc. (CAN) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CAN vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CAN
Canaan Inc.
-37.42%-66.34%-11.26%12.14%-60.00%-13.15%-2.79%31.75%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
-5.55%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%0.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAN achieves a -37.42% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's -5.55% return.


CAN

1D
11.84%
1M
-12.57%
YTD
-37.42%
6M
-51.02%
1Y
-50.81%
3Y*
-45.72%
5Y*
-54.44%
10Y*

SPUS

1D
3.24%
1M
-5.39%
YTD
-5.55%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAN vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAN
CAN Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAN Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAN vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canaan Inc. (CAN) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CANSPUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.41

1.18

-1.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.01

1.80

-1.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.26

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

1.96

-2.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.17

8.40

-9.57

CAN vs. SPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAN Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the SPUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAN and SPUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CANSPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

1.18

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.48

0.72

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.75

-1.05

Correlation

The correlation between CAN and SPUS is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CAN vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison

CAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
CAN
Canaan Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.63%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%

Drawdowns

CAN vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAN drawdown since its inception was -98.94%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAN and SPUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CANSPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.94%

-30.80%

-68.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-81.17%

-12.76%

-68.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.24%

-28.06%

-70.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.81%

-7.77%

-91.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.34%

-6.35%

-76.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.10%

2.98%

+42.12%

Volatility

CAN vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison

Canaan Inc. (CAN) has a higher volatility of 23.91% compared to SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) at 6.04%. This indicates that CAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CANSPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.91%

6.04%

+17.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.33%

11.25%

+81.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

123.63%

20.90%

+102.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.76%

19.20%

+94.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

127.63%

21.43%

+106.20%