PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAN vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAN vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canaan Inc. (CAN) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAN achieves a -50.58% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 14.77% return.


CAN

1D
-2.82%
1M
-17.83%
YTD
-50.58%
6M
-56.97%
1Y
-43.98%
3Y*
-44.91%
5Y*
-46.98%
10Y*

BLOK

1D
-1.82%
1M
2.14%
YTD
14.77%
6M
9.76%
1Y
27.49%
3Y*
48.25%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAN vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CAN
Canaan Inc.
-50.58%-66.34%-11.26%12.14%-60.00%-13.15%-2.79%-32.22%
BLOK
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF
14.77%32.64%53.12%99.62%-62.36%30.76%90.17%2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CAN and BLOK is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2019

0.62

The correlation between CAN and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAN vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAN
CAN Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAN Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAN Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAN vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canaan Inc. (CAN) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CANBLOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.14

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

0.77

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

1.67

-2.44

CAN vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAN Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAN and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAN vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAN drawdown since its inception was -99.12%, which is greater than BLOK's maximum drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAN and BLOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CANBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.12%

-73.33%

-25.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.38%

-35.64%

-48.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.96%

-35.64%

-54.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.01%

-73.33%

-23.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.06%

-11.27%

-87.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.82%

-25.99%

-57.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.17%

16.48%

+40.69%

Volatility

CAN vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

Canaan Inc. (CAN) has a higher volatility of 19.57% compared to Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) at 12.42%. This indicates that CAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CANBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.57%

12.42%

+7.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.78%

29.64%

+31.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

119.58%

39.10%

+80.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

111.24%

42.53%

+68.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

126.20%

39.03%

+87.17%

Dividends

CAN vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

CAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BLOK
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF
0.62%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%
CAN
Canaan Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAN and BLOK have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAN has higher volatility (19.57%) compared to BLOK (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAN dropped -99.12% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAN and BLOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer