PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CAML vs. BTHM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CAML and BTHM is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

CAML vs. BTHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.03%
11.56%
CAML
BTHM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CAML:

1.37

BTHM:

1.77

Sortino Ratio

CAML:

1.93

BTHM:

2.40

Omega Ratio

CAML:

1.25

BTHM:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

CAML:

2.19

BTHM:

2.88

Martin Ratio

CAML:

8.17

BTHM:

10.96

Ulcer Index

CAML:

2.61%

BTHM:

2.44%

Daily Std Dev

CAML:

15.56%

BTHM:

15.11%

Max Drawdown

CAML:

-9.71%

BTHM:

-26.54%

Current Drawdown

CAML:

-1.36%

BTHM:

-0.74%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CAML having a 4.86% return and BTHM slightly lower at 4.73%.


CAML

YTD

4.86%

1M

0.54%

6M

10.04%

1Y

22.28%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BTHM

YTD

4.73%

1M

0.53%

6M

11.56%

1Y

29.00%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CAML vs. BTHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAML has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BTHM's 0.60% expense ratio.


CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for CAML: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAML vs. BTHM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAML
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAML is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAML is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAML is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAML is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAML is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAML is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BTHM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTHM is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CAML vs. BTHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CAML, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.371.82
The chart of Sortino ratio for CAML, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.932.46
The chart of Omega ratio for CAML, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.251.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for CAML, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.192.96
The chart of Martin ratio for CAML, currently valued at 8.17, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.1711.28
CAML
BTHM

The current CAML Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the BTHM Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAML and BTHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.37
1.82
CAML
BTHM

Dividends

CAML vs. BTHM - Dividend Comparison

CAML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than BTHM's 0.70% yield.


TTM202420232022
CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
0.06%0.06%0.00%0.00%
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.70%0.73%0.55%0.90%

Drawdowns

CAML vs. BTHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAML drawdown since its inception was -9.71%, smaller than the maximum BTHM drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAML and BTHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.36%
-0.74%
CAML
BTHM

Volatility

CAML vs. BTHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) is 4.14%, while Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that CAML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.14%
4.57%
CAML
BTHM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab