PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CAML vs. BTHM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CAMLBTHM
YTD Return17.88%24.39%
1Y Return27.49%33.29%
Sharpe Ratio1.842.32
Daily Std Dev14.99%14.50%
Max Drawdown-90.68%-26.54%
Current Drawdown-87.21%-0.91%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CAML and BTHM is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CAML vs. BTHM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CAML achieves a 17.88% return, which is significantly lower than BTHM's 24.39% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
5.61%
9.27%
CAML
BTHM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CAML vs. BTHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAML has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BTHM's 0.60% expense ratio.


CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for CAML: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAML vs. BTHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAML
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CAML, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CAML, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CAML, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CAML, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CAML, currently valued at 10.82, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0010.82
BTHM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.81
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 13.54, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0013.54

CAML vs. BTHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAML Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which roughly equals the BTHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CAML and BTHM.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.84
2.32
CAML
BTHM

Dividends

CAML vs. BTHM - Dividend Comparison

CAML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than BTHM's 0.31% yield.


TTM20232022
CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
0.13%0.15%0.00%
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.31%0.55%0.90%

Drawdowns

CAML vs. BTHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAML drawdown since its inception was -90.68%, which is greater than BTHM's maximum drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAML and BTHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-86.06%
-0.91%
CAML
BTHM

Volatility

CAML vs. BTHM - Volatility Comparison

Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) have volatilities of 4.79% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.79%
4.78%
CAML
BTHM