PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CAML vs. BTHM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CAML and BTHM is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

CAML vs. BTHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.99%
11.93%
CAML
BTHM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CAML:

1.63

BTHM:

2.42

Sortino Ratio

CAML:

2.26

BTHM:

3.23

Omega Ratio

CAML:

1.30

BTHM:

1.44

Calmar Ratio

CAML:

2.57

BTHM:

3.81

Martin Ratio

CAML:

10.49

BTHM:

15.77

Ulcer Index

CAML:

2.38%

BTHM:

2.24%

Daily Std Dev

CAML:

15.32%

BTHM:

14.64%

Max Drawdown

CAML:

-9.71%

BTHM:

-26.54%

Current Drawdown

CAML:

-4.13%

BTHM:

-1.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAML achieves a 25.29% return, which is significantly lower than BTHM's 35.83% return.


CAML

YTD

25.29%

1M

-1.84%

6M

7.98%

1Y

25.12%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BTHM

YTD

35.83%

1M

0.29%

6M

11.94%

1Y

35.56%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CAML vs. BTHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAML has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BTHM's 0.60% expense ratio.


CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for CAML: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAML vs. BTHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CAML, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.632.43
The chart of Sortino ratio for CAML, currently valued at 2.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.263.24
The chart of Omega ratio for CAML, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.301.44
The chart of Calmar ratio for CAML, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.573.83
The chart of Martin ratio for CAML, currently valued at 10.49, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.4915.83
CAML
BTHM

The current CAML Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the BTHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAML and BTHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50Aug 25SeptemberSep 08Sep 15Sep 22Sep 29Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22
1.63
2.43
CAML
BTHM

Dividends

CAML vs. BTHM - Dividend Comparison

CAML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than BTHM's 0.70% yield.


TTM20232022
CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
0.06%0.00%0.00%
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.70%0.55%0.90%

Drawdowns

CAML vs. BTHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAML drawdown since its inception was -9.71%, smaller than the maximum BTHM drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAML and BTHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-4.13%
-1.90%
CAML
BTHM

Volatility

CAML vs. BTHM - Volatility Comparison

Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) at 4.12%. This indicates that CAML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.87%
4.12%
CAML
BTHM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab