PortfoliosLab logo
CALM vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CALM and GIS is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CALM vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CALM:

2.07

GIS:

-0.90

Sortino Ratio

CALM:

2.50

GIS:

-1.06

Omega Ratio

CALM:

1.38

GIS:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

CALM:

2.44

GIS:

-0.51

Martin Ratio

CALM:

6.85

GIS:

-1.33

Ulcer Index

CALM:

10.74%

GIS:

13.56%

Daily Std Dev

CALM:

36.00%

GIS:

21.73%

Max Drawdown

CALM:

-74.08%

GIS:

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

CALM:

-17.01%

GIS:

-34.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CALM:

$4.42B

GIS:

$29.84B

EPS

CALM:

$20.24

GIS:

$4.55

PE Ratio

CALM:

4.51

GIS:

11.98

PEG Ratio

CALM:

0.75

GIS:

3.55

PS Ratio

CALM:

1.16

GIS:

1.52

PB Ratio

CALM:

1.86

GIS:

3.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

CALM:

$3.80B

GIS:

$19.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CALM:

$1.51B

GIS:

$6.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

CALM:

$1.37B

GIS:

$3.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALM achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -12.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CALM has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 8.31%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.08% annualized return.


CALM

YTD

-5.36%

1M

-2.92%

6M

7.00%

1Y

73.88%

5Y*

21.78%

10Y*

8.31%

GIS

YTD

-12.21%

1M

-5.40%

6M

-12.66%

1Y

-19.37%

5Y*

0.35%

10Y*

3.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CALM vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CALM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CALM is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CALM is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CALM is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CALM is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CALM is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CALM is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CALM vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CALM Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CALM and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CALM vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

CALM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than GIS's 4.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
7.27%2.82%7.51%3.17%0.09%0.00%0.98%1.03%0.00%2.70%4.10%2.26%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.38%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%

Drawdowns

CALM vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALM drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALM and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CALM vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 5.69%. This indicates that CALM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CALM vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
1.42B
4.84B
(CALM) Total Revenue
(GIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CALM vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and General Mills, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
50.5%
33.9%
(CALM) Gross Margin
(GIS) Gross Margin
CALM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 716.12M and revenue of 1.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.5%.

GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

CALM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of 635.67M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.8%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

CALM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. reported a net income of 508.53M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in a net margin of 35.9%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.