PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAE vs. BWXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CAE vs. BWXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CAE Inc. (CAE) and BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAE achieves a -18.05% return, which is significantly lower than BWXT's 21.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CAE has underperformed BWXT with an annualized return of 8.15%, while BWXT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.97% annualized return.


CAE

1D
-0.56%
1M
7.64%
YTD
-18.05%
6M
-20.20%
1Y
-4.81%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
-4.69%
10Y*
8.15%

BWXT

1D
2.24%
1M
3.49%
YTD
21.83%
6M
18.03%
1Y
48.38%
3Y*
47.17%
5Y*
30.45%
10Y*
20.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAE vs. BWXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAE
CAE Inc.
-18.05%19.86%17.55%11.63%-23.38%-9.01%5.22%46.08%0.43%35.65%
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
21.83%56.37%46.53%33.87%23.30%-19.40%-1.54%64.48%-36.10%53.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CAE and BWXT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2010

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAE:

$8.06B

BWXT:

$19.30B

EPS

CAE:

CA$0.97

BWXT:

$3.75

PE Ratio

CAE:

36.30

BWXT:

55.94

PEG Ratio

CAE:

2.90

BWXT:

14.79

PS Ratio

CAE:

2.31

BWXT:

5.71

PB Ratio

CAE:

2.15

BWXT:

15.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAE:

CA$4.92B

BWXT:

$3.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAE:

CA$1.39B

BWXT:

$566.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

CAE:

CA$1.08B

BWXT:

$534.48M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAE vs. BWXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAE
CAE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CAE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CAE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BWXT
BWXT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BWXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWXT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BWXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWXT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAE vs. BWXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CAE Inc. (CAE) and BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAEBWXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.22

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

2.10

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.34

4.64

-4.99

CAE vs. BWXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAE Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the BWXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAE and BWXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAE vs. BWXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAE drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, which is greater than BWXT's maximum drawdown of -47.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAE and BWXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAEBWXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.29%

-47.88%

-31.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.98%

-23.14%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.58%

-32.87%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.98%

-32.87%

-22.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.01%

-47.74%

-20.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.78%

-11.80%

-14.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.94%

-13.17%

-9.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.01%

10.45%

+3.56%

Volatility

CAE vs. BWXT - Volatility Comparison

CAE Inc. (CAE) has a higher volatility of 17.45% compared to BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) at 10.88%. This indicates that CAE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAEBWXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.45%

10.88%

+6.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.81%

33.90%

-7.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.74%

45.32%

-13.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.46%

33.04%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.45%

30.88%

+6.57%

Dividends

CAE vs. BWXT - Dividend Comparison

CAE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BWXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
0.50%0.58%0.86%1.20%1.52%1.75%1.26%1.10%1.67%0.69%0.91%30.37%
CAE
CAE Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.29%1.19%1.69%1.83%2.22%2.61%

Financials

CAE vs. BWXT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CAE Inc. and BWX Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.33B
860.22M
(CAE) Total Revenue
(BWXT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CAE values in CAD, BWXT values in USD

CAE vs. BWXT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CAE Inc. and BWX Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
30.2%
0
Portfolio components
CAE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CAE Inc. reported a gross profit of 402.04M and revenue of 1.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.2%.

BWXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 860.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CAE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CAE Inc. reported an operating income of 202.32M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

BWXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 106.69M and revenue of 860.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.

CAE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CAE Inc. reported a net income of 73.29M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

BWXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 91.19M and revenue of 860.22M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CAE and BWXT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAE has higher volatility (17.45%) compared to BWXT (10.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAE dropped -79.29% vs BWXT's -47.88%.

BWXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAE and BWXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer