CAE.TO vs. LDOS
Compare and contrast key facts about CAE Inc. (CAE.TO) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS).
Performance
CAE.TO vs. LDOS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CAE.TO vs. LDOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAE.TO CAE Inc. | -11.62% | 14.36% | 27.62% | 9.20% | -17.93% | -9.53% | 2.97% | 38.82% | 9.03% | 26.35% |
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | -12.21% | 20.70% | 46.08% | 2.20% | 28.60% | -14.97% | 7.11% | 79.54% | -9.65% | 20.92% |
Different Trading Currencies
CAE.TO is traded in CAD, while LDOS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDOS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
CAE.TO:
CA$11.90B
LDOS:
$20.66B
CAE.TO:
CA$1.17
LDOS:
$11.12
CAE.TO:
31.57
LDOS:
14.02
CAE.TO:
1.88
LDOS:
0.11
CAE.TO:
2.44
LDOS:
1.19
CAE.TO:
2.30
LDOS:
4.20
CAE.TO:
CA$4.86B
LDOS:
$17.17B
CAE.TO:
CA$1.38B
LDOS:
$3.03B
CAE.TO:
CA$1.06B
LDOS:
$2.41B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAE.TO achieves a -11.62% return, which is significantly higher than LDOS's -12.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CAE.TO has underperformed LDOS with an annualized return of 10.12%, while LDOS has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return.
CAE.TO
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -9.83%
- YTD
- -11.62%
- 6M
- -8.55%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
LDOS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -11.40%
- YTD
- -12.21%
- 6M
- -18.43%
- 1Y
- 13.40%
- 3Y*
- 21.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.82%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAE.TO vs. LDOS — Risk / Return Rank
CAE.TO
LDOS
CAE.TO vs. LDOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CAE Inc. (CAE.TO) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAE.TO | LDOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | 0.45 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.44 | 0.80 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.12 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.55 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | 1.56 | -1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAE.TO | LDOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 0.45 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.54 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.67 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between CAE.TO and LDOS is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CAE.TO vs. LDOS - Dividend Comparison
CAE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAE.TO CAE Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.22% | 1.51% | 1.46% | 1.65% | 1.89% |
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 1.06% | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.35% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.98% | 29.17% | 3.41% |
Drawdowns
CAE.TO vs. LDOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAE.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.68%, smaller than the maximum LDOS drawdown of -1,966.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAE.TO and LDOS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAE.TO | LDOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.68% | -1,482.10% | +1,401.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.08% | -22.36% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.05% | -36.86% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.91% | -42.29% | -22.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.17% | -1,185.68% | +1,163.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.25% | -424.05% | +398.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.92% | 6.94% | +1.98% |
Volatility
CAE.TO vs. LDOS - Volatility Comparison
CAE Inc. (CAE.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) at 6.79%. This indicates that CAE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CAE.TO | LDOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.21% | 6.79% | +5.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.67% | 24.17% | -2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.30% | 29.65% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.91% | 25.94% | +7.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.07% | 26.73% | +8.34% |
Financials
CAE.TO vs. LDOS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CAE Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAE.TO vs. LDOS - Profitability Comparison
CAE.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CAE Inc. reported a gross profit of 362.20M and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.
LDOS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 673.12M and revenue of 4.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.0%.
CAE.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CAE Inc. reported an operating income of 195.80M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
LDOS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 471.18M and revenue of 4.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
CAE.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CAE Inc. reported a net income of 108.90M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
LDOS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 335.00M and revenue of 4.21B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.