CACX.L vs. URTH
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH).
CACX.L and URTH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CACX.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR. It was launched on Dec 13, 2018. URTH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. Both CACX.L and URTH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CACX.L or URTH.
Key characteristics
| CACX.L | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -6.29% | 20.48% |
| 1Y Return | -4.19% | 28.79% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.62% | 7.11% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.06% | 12.42% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.20% | 10.28% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.36 | 2.67 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.40 | 3.62 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.95 | 1.49 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.33 | 3.83 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.71 | 17.10 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.62% | 1.84% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.17% | 11.80% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.83% | -34.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -14.21% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CACX.L and URTH is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CACX.L vs. URTH - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CACX.L achieves a -6.29% return, which is significantly lower than URTH's 20.48% return. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L has underperformed URTH with an annualized return of 6.20%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CACX.L vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CACX.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CACX.L vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CACX.L vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison
CACX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than URTH's 1.43% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.97% | 2.78% | 2.54% | 1.94% | 1.66% | 3.03% | 3.70% | 2.94% | 3.49% | 3.46% | 0.41% | 0.00% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 1.43% | 1.70% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.35% | 2.32% | 1.04% |
Drawdowns
CACX.L vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CACX.L drawdown since its inception was -32.83%, roughly equal to the maximum URTH drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACX.L and URTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CACX.L vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 3.24%. This indicates that CACX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.