CACI vs. BPTRX

In the year-to-date period, CACI achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than BPTRX's 1.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CACI has underperformed BPTRX with an annualized return of 16.63%, while BPTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CACI International Inc (CACI) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CACI Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the BPTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CACI and BPTRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CACI nor BPTRX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CACI drawdown since its inception was -90.90%, which is greater than BPTRX's maximum drawdown of -68.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACI and BPTRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

CACI International Inc (CACI) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) at 8.83%. This indicates that CACI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.