CAC vs. DAX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Camden National Corporation (CAC) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX).

DAX is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the DAX Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2014.

Performance

CAC vs. DAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camden National Corporation (CAC) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CAC vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAC Camden National Corporation	10.41%	5.83%	19.11%	-5.01%	-10.33%	38.91%	-19.33%	31.79%	-12.45%	-3.18%
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	-7.59%	39.00%	10.55%	23.62%	-18.47%	7.73%	12.27%	22.11%	-22.92%	28.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAC achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly higher than DAX's -7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CAC has outperformed DAX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while DAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.33% annualized return.

CAC

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: 10.41%
• 6M: 25.49%
• 1Y: 22.22%
• 3Y*: 14.67%
• 5Y*: 4.00%
• 10Y*: 9.27%

DAX

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: -10.85%
• YTD: -7.59%
• 6M: -5.61%
• 1Y: 9.46%
• 3Y*: 15.26%
• 5Y*: 7.59%
• 10Y*: 8.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CAC vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAC

CAC Risk / Return Rank: 64
CAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CAC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
CAC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

DAX

DAX Risk / Return Rank: 28
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAC vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden National Corporation (CAC) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAC	DAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.47	+0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	0.81	+0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.10	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	0.58	+0.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.01	2.05	+0.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAC vs. DAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the DAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAC and DAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAC	DAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	0.47	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.38	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.39	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.32	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between CAC and DAX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CAC vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison

CAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than DAX's 1.59% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAC Camden National Corporation	3.54%	3.87%	3.93%	4.46%	3.84%	2.93%	3.69%	2.61%	3.06%	2.18%	1.80%	2.72%
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	1.59%	1.47%	2.24%	2.48%	2.80%	2.65%	2.25%	2.47%	3.33%	1.73%	1.78%	1.41%

Drawdowns

CAC vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAC drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than DAX's maximum drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAC and DAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAC	DAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.56%	-45.58%	-18.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.83%	-14.82%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.52%	-39.96%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.52%	-45.58%	+2.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.80%	-11.28%	+4.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.67%	-10.58%	-5.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.23%	4.18%	+3.05%

Volatility

CAC vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Camden National Corporation (CAC) is 5.72%, while Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that CAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAC	DAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.72%	8.79%	-3.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.15%	12.71%	+8.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.93%	20.17%	+10.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.76%	20.20%	+9.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.87%	21.21%	+10.66%