PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAC vs. DAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAC vs. DAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camden National Corporation (CAC) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAC achieves a 23.83% return, which is significantly higher than DAX's -1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CAC has outperformed DAX with an annualized return of 10.77%, while DAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.


CAC

1D
1.77%
1M
7.02%
YTD
23.83%
6M
20.20%
1Y
38.07%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
10.77%

DAX

1D
-1.06%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
-1.55%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAC vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAC
Camden National Corporation
23.83%5.83%19.11%-5.01%-10.33%38.91%-19.33%31.79%-12.45%-3.18%
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
-1.81%39.00%10.55%23.62%-18.47%7.73%12.27%22.11%-22.92%28.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CAC and DAX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAC vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAC
CAC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DAX
DAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAC vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden National Corporation (CAC) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CACDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.05

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

0.26

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

0.80

+4.65

CAC vs. DAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the DAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAC and DAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAC vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAC drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than DAX's maximum drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAC and DAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CACDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.56%

-45.58%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.83%

-14.82%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.12%

-16.03%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.52%

-38.92%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.52%

-45.58%

+2.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.73%

+5.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.57%

-10.48%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.01%

4.82%

+2.19%

Volatility

CAC vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison

Camden National Corporation (CAC) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) at 5.25%. This indicates that CAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CACDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

5.25%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.29%

14.86%

+5.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.96%

17.98%

+11.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.91%

20.43%

+9.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.98%

20.98%

+11.00%

Dividends

CAC vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison

CAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than DAX's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAC
Camden National Corporation
3.18%3.87%3.93%4.46%3.84%2.93%3.69%2.61%3.06%2.18%1.80%2.72%
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
1.50%1.47%2.24%2.48%2.80%2.65%2.25%2.47%3.33%1.73%1.78%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAC and DAX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAC has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to DAX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAC dropped -64.56% vs DAX's -45.58%.

CAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAC and DAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer