CABO vs. MNST
CABO (Cable One, Inc.) and MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) are both stocks. CABO operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while MNST operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, CABO returned -19.69%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for MNST. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CABO vs. MNST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CABO achieves a -55.06% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's 15.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CABO has underperformed MNST with an annualized return of -19.69%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
CABO
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -32.38%
- YTD
- -55.06%
- 6M
- -57.91%
- 1Y
- -64.05%
- 3Y*
- -55.95%
- 5Y*
- -50.09%
- 10Y*
- -19.69%
MNST
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 14.42%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
CABO vs. MNST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CABO Cable One, Inc. | -55.06% | -68.52% | -32.96% | -20.36% | -59.21% | -20.41% | 50.42% | 82.82% | 17.76% | 14.22% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 15.09% | 45.87% | -8.77% | 13.48% | 5.72% | 3.85% | 45.52% | 29.11% | -22.23% | 42.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CABO and MNST is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2015 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CABO and MNST has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CABO:
$308.55M
MNST:
$87.20B
CABO:
-$44.45
MNST:
$2.06
CABO:
0.20
MNST:
9.89
CABO:
0.21
MNST:
9.99
CABO:
$1.47B
MNST:
$8.79B
CABO:
$490.02M
MNST:
$4.88B
CABO:
$75.56M
MNST:
$2.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CABO vs. MNST — Risk / Return Rank
CABO
MNST
CABO vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cable One, Inc. (CABO) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CABO | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | 1.46 | -2.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | 2.31 | -3.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.30 | -0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 2.15 | -3.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | 6.08 | -7.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CABO | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.86 | 1.46 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.94 | 0.54 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.46 | 0.51 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.39 | 0.60 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
CABO vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CABO drawdown since its inception was -97.79%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABO and MNST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CABO | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.79% | -69.17% | -28.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.61% | -17.70% | -55.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.32% | -26.04% | -67.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.63% | -26.62% | -71.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.79% | -30.42% | -67.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.62% | -1.12% | -96.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.16% | -20.68% | -13.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.00% | 6.25% | +29.75% |
Volatility
CABO vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison
Cable One, Inc. (CABO) has a higher volatility of 29.83% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 14.06%. This indicates that CABO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CABO | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.83% | 14.06% | +15.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.26% | 20.00% | +40.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.56% | 26.33% | +48.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.22% | 24.58% | +28.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.59% | 26.25% | +16.34% |
Dividends
CABO vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison
Neither CABO nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CABO Cable One, Inc. | 0.00% | 2.61% | 3.26% | 2.08% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.91% | 0.92% | 0.97% | 0.35% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CABO vs. MNST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cable One, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CABO vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison
CABO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cable One, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 352.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.
CABO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cable One, Inc. reported an operating income of 86.61M and revenue of 352.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.5%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
CABO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cable One, Inc. reported a net income of 98.72M and revenue of 352.96M, resulting in a net margin of 28.0%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CABO and MNST have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CABO has higher volatility (29.83%) compared to MNST (14.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CABO dropped -97.79% vs MNST's -69.17%.
MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CABO and MNST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer