PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CABK.MC vs. TM2.F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CABK.MCTM2.F
YTD Return61.29%190.01%
1Y Return52.07%181.57%
3Y Return (Ann)37.31%110.24%
5Y Return (Ann)20.83%90.40%
10Y Return (Ann)6.98%60.03%
Sharpe Ratio1.961.49
Sortino Ratio2.408.85
Omega Ratio1.342.06
Calmar Ratio3.419.91
Martin Ratio9.5326.56
Ulcer Index5.08%6.75%
Daily Std Dev24.58%119.05%
Max Drawdown-62.36%-76.16%
Current Drawdown-4.88%-7.45%

Fundamentals


CABK.MCTM2.F
Market Cap€39.05B€2.41B
EPS€0.71€8.11
PE Ratio7.665.73
Total Revenue (TTM)€18.86B€7.64B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between CABK.MC and TM2.F is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CABK.MC vs. TM2.F - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CABK.MC achieves a 61.29% return, which is significantly lower than TM2.F's 190.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CABK.MC has underperformed TM2.F with an annualized return of 6.98%, while TM2.F has yielded a comparatively higher 60.03% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.30%
-5.09%
CABK.MC
TM2.F

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CABK.MC vs. TM2.F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caixabank SA (CABK.MC) and Sydbank A/S (TM2.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CABK.MC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CABK.MC, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CABK.MC, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CABK.MC, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CABK.MC, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CABK.MC, currently valued at 7.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.77
TM2.F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TM2.F, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TM2.F, currently valued at 8.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.008.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TM2.F, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TM2.F, currently valued at 9.86, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.009.86
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TM2.F, currently valued at 28.64, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0028.64

CABK.MC vs. TM2.F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CABK.MC Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the TM2.F Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CABK.MC and TM2.F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.68
1.43
CABK.MC
TM2.F

Dividends

CABK.MC vs. TM2.F - Dividend Comparison

CABK.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, less than TM2.F's 8.77% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CABK.MC
Caixabank SA
7.96%5.01%3.23%0.90%2.70%2.89%3.84%2.71%3.87%4.00%3.62%7.28%
TM2.F
Sydbank A/S
8.77%5.81%4.09%4.74%7.14%6.84%7.52%4.25%1.48%3.21%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CABK.MC vs. TM2.F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABK.MC drawdown since its inception was -62.36%, smaller than the maximum TM2.F drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABK.MC and TM2.F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.07%
-8.99%
CABK.MC
TM2.F

Volatility

CABK.MC vs. TM2.F - Volatility Comparison

Caixabank SA (CABK.MC) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to Sydbank A/S (TM2.F) at 9.11%. This indicates that CABK.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TM2.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%11.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.73%
9.11%
CABK.MC
TM2.F

Financials

CABK.MC vs. TM2.F - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caixabank SA and Sydbank A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in EUR except per share items