PortfoliosLab logo
CAAS vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CAAS and NVDA is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CAAS vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CAAS:

0.87

NVDA:

0.62

Sortino Ratio

CAAS:

1.55

NVDA:

1.19

Omega Ratio

CAAS:

1.19

NVDA:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

CAAS:

0.49

NVDA:

0.98

Martin Ratio

CAAS:

3.18

NVDA:

2.42

Ulcer Index

CAAS:

13.42%

NVDA:

14.92%

Daily Std Dev

CAAS:

50.59%

NVDA:

59.74%

Max Drawdown

CAAS:

-94.04%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

CAAS:

-80.43%

NVDA:

-17.68%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAAS:

$127.32M

NVDA:

$3.00T

EPS

CAAS:

$0.99

NVDA:

$2.94

PE Ratio

CAAS:

4.26

NVDA:

41.84

PEG Ratio

CAAS:

0.61

NVDA:

1.66

PS Ratio

CAAS:

0.20

NVDA:

23.00

PB Ratio

CAAS:

0.35

NVDA:

35.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAAS:

$511.54M

NVDA:

$104.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAAS:

$85.12M

NVDA:

$77.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

CAAS:

$49.58M

NVDA:

$68.38B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAAS achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -8.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CAAS has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of -4.26%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 73.27% annualized return.


CAAS

YTD

2.93%

1M

18.21%

6M

-10.21%

1Y

43.57%

5Y*

23.17%

10Y*

-4.26%

NVDA

YTD

-8.40%

1M

10.88%

6M

-15.31%

1Y

36.89%

5Y*

74.20%

10Y*

73.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAAS vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAAS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAAS is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAAS is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAAS is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAAS is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAAS is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAAS is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CAAS vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CAAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAAS and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CAAS vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

CAAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.96%, more than NVDA's 0.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
18.96%19.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.54%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.03%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

CAAS vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAAS drawdown since its inception was -94.04%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAAS and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CAAS vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) is 11.32%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 14.02%. This indicates that CAAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CAAS vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Automotive Systems, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
188.72M
39.33B
(CAAS) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CAAS vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between China Automotive Systems, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
15.6%
73.0%
(CAAS) Gross Margin
(NVDA) Gross Margin
CAAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, China Automotive Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 29.46M and revenue of 188.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.72B and revenue of 39.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.

CAAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, China Automotive Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.70M and revenue of 188.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 24.03B and revenue of 39.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.1%.

CAAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, China Automotive Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 9.07M and revenue of 188.72M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 22.09B and revenue of 39.33B, resulting in a net margin of 56.2%.