CAAS vs. NVDA
CAAS (China Automotive Systems, Inc.) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. CAAS operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CAAS returned 2.70%/yr vs 68.84%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAAS vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAAS achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 15.15% return. Over the past 10 years, CAAS has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 2.70%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 68.84% annualized return.
CAAS
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 9.24%
- 3Y*
- 2.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.70%
NVDA
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 8.20%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 6M
- 19.59%
- 1Y
- 52.10%
- 3Y*
- 76.15%
- 5Y*
- 65.05%
- 10Y*
- 68.84%
CAAS vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAAS China Automotive Systems, Inc. | 4.11% | 3.90% | 52.01% | -44.31% | 116.42% | -57.05% | 98.10% | 29.10% | -49.17% | -10.45% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 15.15% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAAS and NVDA is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2003 | 0.18 |
The correlation between CAAS and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CAAS:
$133.81M
NVDA:
$5.24T
CAAS:
$1.42
NVDA:
$6.53
CAAS:
3.12
NVDA:
32.91
CAAS:
0.03
NVDA:
0.18
CAAS:
0.17
NVDA:
20.72
CAAS:
0.33
NVDA:
26.80
CAAS:
$765.74M
NVDA:
$253.49B
CAAS:
$145.46M
NVDA:
$187.95B
CAAS:
$71.37M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAAS vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
CAAS
NVDA
CAAS vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAAS | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.26 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 2.59 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | 6.36 | -5.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAAS | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 1.53 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 1.27 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 1.39 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.63 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
CAAS vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAAS drawdown since its inception was -94.04%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAAS and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAAS | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.04% | -89.72% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.32% | -20.21% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.96% | -36.88% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.16% | -66.34% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.21% | -66.34% | -13.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.43% | -8.90% | -70.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.83% | -36.21% | -35.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.31% | 8.21% | +3.10% |
Volatility
CAAS vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) is 8.50%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that CAAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAAS | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 12.53% | -4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.73% | 25.54% | -5.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.81% | 34.22% | -2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.92% | 51.69% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.43% | 49.80% | +32.63% |
Dividends
CAAS vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
CAAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAAS China Automotive Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
CAAS vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Automotive Systems, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAAS vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
CAAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Automotive Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 52.95M and revenue of 229.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.1%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
CAAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Automotive Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 25.76M and revenue of 229.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
CAAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Automotive Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 18.42M and revenue of 229.19M, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAAS and NVDA have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to CAAS (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAAS dropped -94.04% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAAS and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer