PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

C vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Citigroup Inc. (C) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, C has outperformed T with an annualized return of 15.14%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.86% annualized return.


C

1D
0.61%
1M
6.16%
YTD
15.36%
6M
23.58%
1Y
74.17%
3Y*
44.93%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
15.14%

T

1D
-1.10%
1M
-10.57%
YTD
-7.40%
6M
-7.40%
1Y
-16.38%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C
Citigroup Inc.
15.36%70.38%41.93%18.98%-22.09%0.93%-19.70%57.82%-28.49%27.03%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.40%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between C and T is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.32

The correlation between C and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

C:

$8.65

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

C:

15.41

T:

7.39

PS Ratio

C:

1.44

T:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

C:

$171.19B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

C:

$77.85B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

C:

$24.12B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citigroup Inc. (C) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

0.89

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

-0.75

+5.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.54

-1.59

+16.13

C vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

-0.75

+3.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.28

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.12

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.38

-0.22

Drawdowns

C vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.00%

-64.15%

-33.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-21.87%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.31%

-21.87%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.78%

-32.01%

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

-42.35%

-14.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.43%

-21.87%

-42.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-15.72%

-27.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

10.34%

-5.22%

Volatility

C vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Citigroup Inc. (C) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 7.50%. This indicates that C's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

7.50%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.84%

17.57%

+5.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.19%

21.98%

+6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.18%

23.97%

+5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.23%

23.71%

+9.52%

Dividends

C vs. T - Dividend Comparison

C's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than T's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.80%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.93%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

C vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citigroup Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00B20222023202420252026
44.14B
33.47B
(C) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


C and T have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

C has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to T (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, C dropped -98.00% vs T's -64.15%.

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer