PortfoliosLab logo
C vs. BK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between C and BK is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

C vs. BK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Citigroup Inc. (C) and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

C:

0.64

BK:

2.17

Sortino Ratio

C:

1.10

BK:

2.92

Omega Ratio

C:

1.16

BK:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

C:

0.27

BK:

3.15

Martin Ratio

C:

2.27

BK:

11.75

Ulcer Index

C:

10.33%

BK:

4.71%

Daily Std Dev

C:

34.31%

BK:

24.62%

Max Drawdown

C:

-98.00%

BK:

-72.42%

Current Drawdown

C:

-80.45%

BK:

-1.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

C:

$133.45B

BK:

$61.46B

EPS

C:

$6.33

BK:

$6.13

PE Ratio

C:

11.29

BK:

14.01

PEG Ratio

C:

1.04

BK:

1.10

PS Ratio

C:

1.86

BK:

3.27

PB Ratio

C:

0.68

BK:

1.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

C:

$98.49B

BK:

$18.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

C:

$57.03B

BK:

$18.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

C:

$25.46B

BK:

$7.22B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than BK's 14.72% return. Over the past 10 years, C has underperformed BK with an annualized return of 6.25%, while BK has yielded a comparatively higher 10.09% annualized return.


C

YTD

8.02%

1M

22.50%

6M

8.93%

1Y

21.90%

5Y*

17.46%

10Y*

6.25%

BK

YTD

14.72%

1M

12.86%

6M

12.02%

1Y

52.90%

5Y*

25.66%

10Y*

10.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

C vs. BK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of C is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of C is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of C is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of C is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of C is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of C is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BK is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BK is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BK is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BK is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BK is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BK is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

C vs. BK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citigroup Inc. (C) and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current C Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the BK Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C and BK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

C vs. BK - Dividend Comparison

C's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than BK's 2.16% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
C
Citigroup Inc.
2.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%0.07%
BK
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
2.16%2.32%3.04%3.12%2.24%2.92%2.34%2.21%1.60%1.52%1.65%1.63%

Drawdowns

C vs. BK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than BK's maximum drawdown of -72.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C and BK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

C vs. BK - Volatility Comparison

Citigroup Inc. (C) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) at 5.97%. This indicates that C's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

C vs. BK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citigroup Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20212022202320242025
41.46B
4.69B
(C) Total Revenue
(BK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items