BZFDW vs. SCHD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BZFDW (BuzzFeed) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 5 years, BZFDW returned -55.48%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BZFDW vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BuzzFeed (BZFDW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BZFDW achieves a -11.11% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return.

BZFDW

• 1D: -5.88%
• 1M: -36.18%
• YTD: -11.11%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: -68.58%
• 3Y*: -27.99%
• 5Y*: -55.48%
• 10Y*: —

SCHD

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -2.47%
• YTD: 17.72%
• 6M: 17.25%
• 1Y: 24.56%
• 3Y*: 14.60%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BZFDW vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BZFDW BuzzFeed	-11.11%	-86.00%	337.96%	2.75%	-92.00%	-50.00%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	17.72%	4.34%	11.66%	4.54%	-3.26%	21.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BZFDW and SCHD is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021	0.03

The correlation between BZFDW and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.04 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BZFDW vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BZFDW

BZFDW Risk / Return Rank: 33
BZFDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BZFDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BZFDW Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BZFDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BZFDW Martin Ratio Rank: 21

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 77
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BZFDW vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BuzzFeed (BZFDW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BZFDW	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	2.23	-2.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	3.40	-2.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.40	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	5.35	-6.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.04	12.94	-13.97

BZFDW vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BZFDW Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BZFDW and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BZFDW vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BZFDW drawdown since its inception was -99.15%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BZFDW and SCHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BZFDW	SCHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.15%	-33.37%	-65.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-88.81%	-4.61%	-84.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.54%	-16.13%	-80.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.14%	-16.85%	-82.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.51%	-2.47%	-96.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.31%	-3.31%	-78.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	66.20%	1.90%	+64.30%

Volatility

BZFDW vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

BuzzFeed (BZFDW) has a higher volatility of 40.36% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that BZFDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BZFDW	SCHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	40.36%	3.58%	+36.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	137.50%	7.73%	+129.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	217.09%	11.07%	+206.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	246.81%	14.36%	+232.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	242.84%	16.71%	+226.13%

Dividends

BZFDW vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

BZFDW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BZFDW BuzzFeed	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.30%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BZFDW and SCHD in my portfolio?

BZFDW and SCHD have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BZFDW or SCHD?

BZFDW has higher volatility (40.36%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BZFDW dropped -99.15% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.