PortfoliosLab logo
BZ=F vs. XOM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BZ=F and XOM is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BZ=F vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BZ=F:

-0.78

XOM:

-0.27

Sortino Ratio

BZ=F:

-1.04

XOM:

-0.10

Omega Ratio

BZ=F:

0.88

XOM:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

BZ=F:

-0.40

XOM:

-0.24

Martin Ratio

BZ=F:

-1.54

XOM:

-0.53

Ulcer Index

BZ=F:

15.13%

XOM:

8.49%

Daily Std Dev

BZ=F:

28.19%

XOM:

23.95%

Max Drawdown

BZ=F:

-86.77%

XOM:

-62.40%

Current Drawdown

BZ=F:

-56.05%

XOM:

-12.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BZ=F achieves a -13.99% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BZ=F has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of -0.36%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 6.62% annualized return.


BZ=F

YTD

-13.99%

1M

-0.86%

6M

-13.09%

1Y

-22.45%

5Y*

16.03%

10Y*

-0.36%

XOM

YTD

0.65%

1M

4.04%

6M

-9.87%

1Y

-5.96%

5Y*

24.89%

10Y*

6.62%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BZ=F vs. XOM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BZ=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BZ=F is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BZ=F is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BZ=F is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BZ=F is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BZ=F is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BZ=F is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XOM is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XOM is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XOM is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XOM is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XOM is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XOM is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BZ=F vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BZ=F Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BZ=F and XOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

BZ=F vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BZ=F drawdown since its inception was -86.77%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BZ=F and XOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BZ=F vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) have volatilities of 9.63% and 9.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...