PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BZ=F vs. GLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BZ=FGLD
YTD Return16.17%13.31%
1Y Return14.20%17.25%
3Y Return (Ann)9.98%9.20%
5Y Return (Ann)4.25%12.29%
10Y Return (Ann)-1.90%5.67%
Sharpe Ratio0.601.41
Daily Std Dev27.46%12.27%
Max Drawdown-86.77%-45.56%
Current Drawdown-38.73%-2.08%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between BZ=F and GLD is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BZ=F vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BZ=F achieves a 16.17% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 13.31% return. Over the past 10 years, BZ=F has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of -1.90%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 5.67% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.34%
16.37%
BZ=F
GLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Crude Oil Brent

SPDR Gold Trust

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BZ=F vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BZ=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.000.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.000.95
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.901.001.101.201.301.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.500.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.001.44
GLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLD, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.001.70
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLD, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.002.57
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLD, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.901.001.101.201.301.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLD, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.501.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLD, currently valued at 7.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.007.57

BZ=F vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BZ=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BZ=F and GLD.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.60
1.70
BZ=F
GLD

Drawdowns

BZ=F vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BZ=F drawdown since its inception was -86.77%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BZ=F and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-38.73%
-2.08%
BZ=F
GLD

Volatility

BZ=F vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) have volatilities of 5.04% and 5.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
5.04%
5.02%
BZ=F
GLD