BYLD vs. FDHY
BYLD (iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF) and FDHY (Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BYLD is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Morningstar U.S. Bond Market Yield-Optimized Index, while FDHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity. BYLD is passively managed, while FDHY is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BYLD returned 2.32%/yr vs 4.08%/yr for FDHY. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BYLD charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDHY.
Performance
BYLD vs. FDHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYLD achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than FDHY's 2.41% return.
BYLD
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
FDHY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- 9.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- —
BYLD vs. FDHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF | 1.41% | 8.41% | 4.17% | 8.30% | -10.33% | -1.25% | 4.25% | 12.79% | 0.55% |
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF | 2.41% | 9.24% | 7.53% | 11.14% | -11.30% | 4.33% | 10.71% | 16.87% | -2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYLD and FDHY is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018 | 0.58 |
The correlation between BYLD and FDHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BYLD vs. FDHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BYLD
FDHY
Energy
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
BYLD
FDHY
Real Estate
BYLD
FDHY
-
Basic Materials
BYLD
-
FDHY
-
Communication Services
BYLD
-
FDHY
-
Consumer Cyclical
BYLD
-
FDHY
-
Consumer Defensive
BYLD
-
FDHY
-
Financial Services
BYLD
-
FDHY
-
Healthcare
BYLD
-
FDHY
-
Industrials
BYLD
-
FDHY
-
Technology
BYLD
-
FDHY
-
Utilities
BYLD
-
FDHY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYLD vs. FDHY — Risk / Return Rank
BYLD
FDHY
BYLD vs. FDHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BYLD | FDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 2.55 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 3.92 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.53 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.91 | -1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 16.71 | -5.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BYLD | FDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.55 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.57 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.72 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
BYLD vs. FDHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYLD drawdown since its inception was -14.75%, smaller than the maximum FDHY drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYLD and FDHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYLD | FDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.75% | -20.01% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -2.12% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.94% | -5.26% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.65% | -16.38% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -2.88% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 0.50% | +0.17% |
Volatility
BYLD vs. FDHY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) at 1.26%. This indicates that BYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYLD | FDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 1.26% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 2.75% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 3.63% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 7.13% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 8.05% | -2.62% |
BYLD vs. FDHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BYLD has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FDHY's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BYLD vs. FDHY - Dividend Comparison
BYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, less than FDHY's 6.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF | 5.35% | 5.32% | 5.31% | 4.45% | 3.39% | 2.18% | 3.41% | 3.67% | 4.22% | 3.22% | 3.14% | 3.37% |
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF | 6.51% | 6.56% | 6.58% | 6.26% | 5.34% | 6.09% | 5.78% | 4.94% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BYLD and FDHY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYLD has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to FDHY (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYLD dropped -14.75% vs FDHY's -20.01%.
On 5-year performance, FDHY leads with 4.08% vs 2.32% for BYLD. On fees, BYLD is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, FDHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDHY has performed better with a 4.08% return vs 2.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BYLD is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDHY.
FDHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 5.80% for BYLD.
BYLD is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while FDHY is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for BYLD and 0.45% for FDHY.
FDHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BYLD and FDHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer