PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BYG.L vs. AMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BYG.LAMT
YTD Return0.48%-8.04%
1Y Return21.09%8.97%
3Y Return (Ann)-4.61%-8.05%
5Y Return (Ann)3.93%0.76%
10Y Return (Ann)11.66%9.34%
Sharpe Ratio0.570.36
Sortino Ratio0.990.67
Omega Ratio1.111.09
Calmar Ratio0.360.23
Martin Ratio1.620.92
Ulcer Index8.18%9.69%
Daily Std Dev24.37%24.61%
Max Drawdown-76.75%-98.70%
Current Drawdown-24.66%-29.93%

Fundamentals


BYG.LAMT
Market Cap£2.37B$90.52B
EPS£1.26$4.16
PE Ratio9.3846.57
PEG Ratio2.401.24
Total Revenue (TTM)£100.06M$11.04B
Gross Profit (TTM)£76.25M$6.09B
EBITDA (TTM)£64.48M$6.65B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between BYG.L and AMT is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BYG.L vs. AMT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BYG.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's -8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, BYG.L has outperformed AMT with an annualized return of 11.66%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.34% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.74%
5.23%
BYG.L
AMT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BYG.L vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Big Yellow Group plc (BYG.L) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BYG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BYG.L, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.65
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BYG.L, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BYG.L, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BYG.L, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BYG.L, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.84
AMT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.01
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMT, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.02

BYG.L vs. AMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the AMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYG.L and AMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.65
0.01
BYG.L
AMT

Dividends

BYG.L vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison

BYG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than AMT's 3.39% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BYG.L
Big Yellow Group plc
3.82%3.70%1.87%2.20%3.07%2.80%3.69%3.38%3.84%2.90%3.09%2.93%
AMT
American Tower Corporation
3.39%2.99%2.77%1.78%2.02%1.64%1.99%1.84%2.05%1.87%1.42%1.38%

Drawdowns

BYG.L vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYG.L drawdown since its inception was -76.75%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYG.L and AMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-29.16%
-29.93%
BYG.L
AMT

Volatility

BYG.L vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Big Yellow Group plc (BYG.L) is 7.49%, while American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that BYG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.49%
11.02%
BYG.L
AMT

Financials

BYG.L vs. AMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Big Yellow Group plc and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. BYG.L values in GBp, AMT values in USD