BYDIY vs. FNGU
BYDIY (BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited) is a stock, while FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Over the past year, BYDIY returned -0.64% vs 64.67% for FNGU. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BYDIY vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYDIY achieves a -9.60% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 36.18% return.
BYDIY
- 1D
- 10.30%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- -9.60%
- 6M
- -12.52%
- 1Y
- -0.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- -5.34%
- 10Y*
- —
FNGU
- 1D
- -3.75%
- 1M
- 33.96%
- YTD
- 36.18%
- 6M
- 16.22%
- 1Y
- 64.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BYDIY vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited | -9.60% | -38.52% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs | 36.18% | 4.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYDIY and FNGU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYDIY vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank
BYDIY
FNGU
BYDIY vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BYDIY | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.21 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 1.09 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 2.64 | -2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BYDIY | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 1.13 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.40 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
BYDIY vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYDIY drawdown since its inception was -67.99%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDIY and FNGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYDIY | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.99% | -60.84% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.93% | -59.55% | +15.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.07% | -4.84% | -44.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -22.06% | -13.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.01% | 24.57% | -0.56% |
Volatility
BYDIY vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) has a higher volatility of 24.95% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) at 16.40%. This indicates that BYDIY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYDIY | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.95% | 16.40% | +8.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.65% | 44.77% | -5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.05% | 57.50% | +3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.90% | 78.60% | -10.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.77% | 78.60% | -10.83% |
Dividends
BYDIY vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
BYDIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited | 1.96% | 1.77% | 1.31% | 0.53% | 0.48% | 1.35% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BYDIY and FNGU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYDIY has higher volatility (24.95%) compared to FNGU (16.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYDIY dropped -67.99% vs FNGU's -60.84%.
FNGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BYDIY and FNGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer