BYDIY vs. CNYA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA).

CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016.

Performance

BYDIY vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BYDIY vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited	-19.46%	-20.04%	29.23%	40.71%	32.48%	-56.35%
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF	-0.93%	26.48%	10.78%	-13.76%	-26.51%	-2.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYDIY achieves a -19.46% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's -0.93% return.

BYDIY

• 1D: -4.71%
• 1M: -8.57%
• YTD: -19.46%
• 6M: -31.99%
• 1Y: -30.32%
• 3Y*: 8.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNYA

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -5.18%
• YTD: -0.93%
• 6M: 1.32%
• 1Y: 25.22%
• 3Y*: 4.59%
• 5Y*: -1.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BYDIY vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYDIY

BYDIY Risk / Return Rank: 18
BYDIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
BYDIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BYDIY Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BYDIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BYDIY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

CNYA

CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 74
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYDIY vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BYDIY	CNYA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	1.34	-1.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	1.84	-2.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.27	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	2.15	-2.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	9.28	-10.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BYDIY vs. CNYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYDIY Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the CNYA Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYDIY and CNYA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BYDIY	CNYA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46	1.34	-1.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	0.23	-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between BYDIY and CNYA is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BYDIY vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison

BYDIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than CNYA's 1.93% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited	2.20%	1.77%	1.31%	0.53%	0.48%	1.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF	1.93%	1.92%	2.51%	4.23%	2.69%	1.11%	1.06%	1.21%	3.92%	0.97%	1.38%

Drawdowns

BYDIY vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYDIY drawdown since its inception was -67.99%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDIY and CNYA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BYDIY	CNYA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.99%	-49.49%	-18.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.95%	-11.47%	-26.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.63%	-21.52%	-33.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.97%	-20.77%	-14.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.99%	2.67%	+18.32%

Volatility

BYDIY vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison

BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) has a higher volatility of 11.86% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 4.99%. This indicates that BYDIY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BYDIY	CNYA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.86%	4.99%	+6.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.01%	11.62%	+27.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.73%	18.85%	+47.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.58%	23.71%	+43.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.58%	23.60%	+43.98%