BYDIY vs. CNYA
BYDIY (BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited) is a stock, while CNYA (iShares MSCI China A ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Over the past 5 years, BYDIY returned -11.82%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CNYA. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYDIY achieves a -36.20% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's 12.12% return.
BYDIY
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- YTD
- -36.20%
- 6M
- -33.25%
- 1Y
- -25.54%
- 3Y*
- -0.90%
- 5Y*
- -11.82%
- 10Y*
- —
CNYA
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 6M
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- 41.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited | -36.20% | -20.04% | 29.23% | 40.71% | 32.48% | -56.35% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 12.12% | 26.48% | 10.78% | -13.76% | -26.51% | -1.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYDIY and CNYA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYDIY vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank
BYDIY
CNYA
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BYDIY | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.41 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 5.44 | -5.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 14.99 | -15.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYDIY drawdown since its inception was -67.99%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDIY and CNYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYDIY | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.99% | -49.49% | -18.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.84% | -7.59% | -43.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.06% | -33.35% | -30.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.99% | -44.65% | -23.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.06% | -11.18% | -52.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.82% | -20.65% | -15.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.60% | 2.75% | +22.85% |
Volatility
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) has a higher volatility of 28.73% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 6.78%. This indicates that BYDIY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYDIY | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.73% | 6.78% | +21.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.47% | 13.22% | +31.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.00% | 18.11% | +45.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.66% | 23.88% | +44.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.14% | 23.51% | +44.63% |
Dividends
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
BYDIY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited | 0.00% | 1.77% | 1.31% | 0.53% | 0.48% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.68% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BYDIY and CNYA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYDIY has higher volatility (28.73%) compared to CNYA (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYDIY dropped -67.99% vs CNYA's -49.49%.
CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BYDIY and CNYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer