BYDIY vs. CNYA
BYDIY (BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited) is a stock, while CNYA (iShares MSCI China A ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Over the past 5 years, BYDIY returned -10.72%/yr vs -0.89%/yr for CNYA. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYDIY achieves a -32.15% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's 6.64% return.
BYDIY
- 1D
- 9.75%
- 1M
- -14.65%
- 6M
- -33.95%
- YTD
- -32.15%
- 1Y
- -28.66%
- 3Y*
- -0.19%
- 5Y*
- -10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
CNYA
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 28.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- -0.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited | -32.15% | -20.04% | 29.23% | 40.71% | 32.48% | -56.35% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 6.64% | 26.48% | 10.78% | -13.76% | -26.51% | -1.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYDIY and CNYA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYDIY vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank
BYDIY
CNYA
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BYDIY | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.26 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 3.68 | -4.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 9.67 | -10.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYDIY drawdown since its inception was -68.26%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDIY and CNYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYDIY | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.26% | -49.49% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.59% | -7.59% | -49.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.26% | -33.35% | -34.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.26% | -44.65% | -23.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.78% | -15.52% | -46.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -20.62% | -15.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.24% | 2.89% | +25.35% |
Volatility
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) has a higher volatility of 35.06% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 8.08%. This indicates that BYDIY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYDIY | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.06% | 8.08% | +26.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.79% | 14.66% | +37.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.78% | 19.14% | +49.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.73% | 23.98% | +45.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.88% | 23.57% | +45.31% |
Dividends
BYDIY vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
BYDIY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited | 0.00% | 1.77% | 1.31% | 0.53% | 0.48% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BYDIY and CNYA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYDIY has higher volatility (35.06%) compared to CNYA (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYDIY dropped -68.26% vs CNYA's -49.49%.
CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BYDIY and CNYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer