PortfoliosLab logo
BXSL vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BXSL and ET is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BXSL vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BXSL:

0.14

ET:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

BXSL:

0.25

ET:

1.02

Omega Ratio

BXSL:

1.04

ET:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

BXSL:

0.08

ET:

0.70

Martin Ratio

BXSL:

0.31

ET:

2.29

Ulcer Index

BXSL:

5.53%

ET:

7.51%

Daily Std Dev

BXSL:

20.94%

ET:

27.33%

Max Drawdown

BXSL:

-36.80%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

BXSL:

-11.64%

ET:

-15.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BXSL:

$6.79B

ET:

$59.06B

EPS

BXSL:

$3.45

ET:

$1.32

PE Ratio

BXSL:

8.63

ET:

13.04

PS Ratio

BXSL:

5.12

ET:

0.72

PB Ratio

BXSL:

1.12

ET:

1.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

BXSL:

$655.02M

ET:

$82.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BXSL:

$585.56M

ET:

$14.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

BXSL:

$525.37M

ET:

$11.63B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BXSL achieves a -5.66% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -9.01% return.


BXSL

YTD

-5.66%

1M

8.89%

6M

-0.67%

1Y

3.79%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ET

YTD

-9.01%

1M

10.25%

6M

3.04%

1Y

16.23%

5Y*

28.18%

10Y*

1.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BXSL vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BXSL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BXSL is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BXSL is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BXSL is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BXSL is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BXSL is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BXSL is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BXSL vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BXSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BXSL and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BXSL vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.35%, more than ET's 7.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
10.35%9.53%10.64%13.02%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.53%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

BXSL vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BXSL drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXSL and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BXSL vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) is 8.06%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that BXSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BXSL vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
164.77M
21.02B
(BXSL) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items