PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BXSL vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BXSL and ET is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

BXSL vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
60.20%
154.90%
BXSL
ET

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BXSL:

2.00

ET:

2.87

Sortino Ratio

BXSL:

2.69

ET:

4.02

Omega Ratio

BXSL:

1.35

ET:

1.51

Calmar Ratio

BXSL:

2.94

ET:

2.45

Martin Ratio

BXSL:

8.62

ET:

22.37

Ulcer Index

BXSL:

3.19%

ET:

2.19%

Daily Std Dev

BXSL:

13.76%

ET:

17.09%

Max Drawdown

BXSL:

-36.80%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

BXSL:

-1.04%

ET:

-5.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BXSL:

$6.89B

ET:

$63.82B

EPS

BXSL:

$3.59

ET:

$1.36

PE Ratio

BXSL:

8.86

ET:

13.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

BXSL:

$986.54M

ET:

$83.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BXSL:

$913.80M

ET:

$12.71B

EBITDA (TTM)

BXSL:

$742.67M

ET:

$14.83B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BXSL achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 48.15% return.


BXSL

YTD

25.74%

1M

2.71%

6M

6.55%

1Y

27.56%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ET

YTD

48.15%

1M

3.17%

6M

24.70%

1Y

48.25%

5Y*

17.97%

10Y*

4.12%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BXSL vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BXSL, currently valued at 2.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.002.87
The chart of Sortino ratio for BXSL, currently valued at 2.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.694.02
The chart of Omega ratio for BXSL, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.351.51
The chart of Calmar ratio for BXSL, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.945.86
The chart of Martin ratio for BXSL, currently valued at 8.62, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.008.6222.37
BXSL
ET

The current BXSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BXSL and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.00
2.87
BXSL
ET

Dividends

BXSL vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.55%, more than ET's 6.77% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
9.55%10.64%13.02%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
6.77%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%3.19%

Drawdowns

BXSL vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BXSL drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXSL and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.04%
-5.04%
BXSL
ET

Volatility

BXSL vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) is 4.55%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that BXSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.55%
8.02%
BXSL
ET

Financials

BXSL vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab