PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BWZ vs. TLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BWZTLT
YTD Return-4.21%-6.14%
1Y Return0.20%4.03%
3Y Return (Ann)-4.32%-12.58%
5Y Return (Ann)-2.42%-5.92%
10Y Return (Ann)-1.86%-0.37%
Sharpe Ratio0.190.43
Sortino Ratio0.330.70
Omega Ratio1.041.08
Calmar Ratio0.050.14
Martin Ratio0.421.05
Ulcer Index3.39%6.10%
Daily Std Dev7.26%15.01%
Max Drawdown-34.22%-48.35%
Current Drawdown-28.49%-41.52%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between BWZ and TLT is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BWZ vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BWZ achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -6.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BWZ has underperformed TLT with an annualized return of -1.86%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively higher -0.37% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.65%
-0.55%
BWZ
TLT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BWZ vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.


BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for BWZ: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%
Expense ratio chart for TLT: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BWZ vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BWZ, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.19
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BWZ, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BWZ, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BWZ, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BWZ, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.42
TLT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TLT, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TLT, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TLT, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TLT, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.14
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TLT, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.05

BWZ vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWZ and TLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.19
0.43
BWZ
TLT

Dividends

BWZ vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

BWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than TLT's 4.10% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
2.40%1.62%0.44%0.60%0.13%0.44%1.10%0.40%0.13%0.06%0.20%0.09%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.10%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%2.67%3.26%

Drawdowns

BWZ vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWZ drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWZ and TLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-28.49%
-41.52%
BWZ
TLT

Volatility

BWZ vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) is 3.05%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that BWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.05%
5.07%
BWZ
TLT