PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BWZ vs. TLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BWZTLT
YTD Return-5.37%-9.24%
1Y Return-3.28%-13.03%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.99%-11.50%
5Y Return (Ann)-2.57%-4.29%
10Y Return (Ann)-2.82%0.03%
Sharpe Ratio-0.41-0.64
Daily Std Dev6.67%16.88%
Max Drawdown-34.23%-48.35%
Current Drawdown-29.35%-43.45%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between BWZ and TLT is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BWZ vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BWZ achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -9.24% return. Over the past 10 years, BWZ has underperformed TLT with an annualized return of -2.82%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively higher 0.03% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.02%
24.35%
BWZ
TLT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF

BWZ vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.


BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for BWZ: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%
Expense ratio chart for TLT: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BWZ vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BWZ, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BWZ, currently valued at -0.54, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00-0.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BWZ, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.500.94
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BWZ, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BWZ, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00-0.77
TLT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TLT, currently valued at -0.64, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TLT, currently valued at -0.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00-0.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TLT, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.500.91
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TLT, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TLT, currently valued at -1.04, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00-1.04

BWZ vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BWZ and TLT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.41
-0.64
BWZ
TLT

Dividends

BWZ vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

BWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than TLT's 3.96% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
2.07%1.63%0.44%0.60%0.13%0.43%1.10%0.40%0.13%0.06%0.19%0.09%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.96%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%2.67%3.26%

Drawdowns

BWZ vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWZ drawdown since its inception was -34.23%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWZ and TLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-29.35%
-43.45%
BWZ
TLT

Volatility

BWZ vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) is 2.13%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that BWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.13%
4.08%
BWZ
TLT