BWB vs. CZR
BWB (Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc.) and CZR (Caesars Entertainment, Inc.) are both stocks. BWB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while CZR operates in Resorts & Casinos (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, BWB returned 5.00%/yr vs -18.95%/yr for CZR. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BWB vs. CZR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWB achieves a 18.48% return, which is significantly lower than CZR's 27.11% return.
BWB
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- YTD
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 23.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.08%
CZR
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- 6M
- 44.39%
- YTD
- 27.11%
- 1Y
- 15.77%
- 3Y*
- -18.76%
- 5Y*
- -18.95%
- 10Y*
- 7.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.01M | $3.62M | $3.48M | |
| $88.08M | $107.29M | $190.73M |
BWB vs. CZR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWB Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. | 18.48% | 29.76% | -0.07% | -23.79% | 0.28% | 41.63% | -9.36% | 30.62% | -16.67% |
CZR Caesars Entertainment, Inc. | 27.11% | -30.01% | -28.71% | 12.69% | -55.52% | 25.93% | 24.53% | 64.71% | -2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWB and CZR is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2018 | 0.33 |
The correlation between BWB and CZR shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BWB:
$579.08M
CZR:
$6.06B
BWB:
$2.65
CZR:
-$2.27
BWB:
1.50
CZR:
0.52
BWB:
$294.46M
CZR:
$11.65B
BWB:
$73.58M
CZR:
$3.59B
BWB:
$110.30M
CZR:
$2.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWB vs. CZR — Risk / Return Rank
BWB
CZR
BWB vs. CZR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB) and Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BWB | CZR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.11 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 0.45 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 1.13 | +5.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BWB vs. CZR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWB drawdown since its inception was -59.49%, smaller than the maximum CZR drawdown of -89.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWB and CZR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWB | CZR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.49% | -89.78% | +30.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.62% | -34.91% | +19.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.19% | -67.95% | +45.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.49% | -84.82% | +25.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.65% | -75.12% | +67.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.87% | -32.43% | +12.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.86% | 13.95% | -8.09% |
Volatility
BWB vs. CZR - Volatility Comparison
Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) at 2.90%. This indicates that BWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CZR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWB | CZR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 2.90% | +5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.23% | 33.24% | -16.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.32% | 49.14% | -21.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.52% | 52.22% | -19.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.22% | 60.86% | -26.64% |
Dividends
BWB vs. CZR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BWB nor CZR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BWB vs. CZR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. and Caesars Entertainment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BWB vs. CZR - Profitability Comparison
BWB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. reported a gross profit of -44.84M and revenue of 63.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -70.9%.
CZR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BWB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. reported an operating income of -22.84M and revenue of 63.26M, resulting in an operating margin of -36.1%.
CZR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. reported an operating income of 513.00M and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
BWB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. reported a net income of 14.01M and revenue of 63.26M, resulting in a net margin of 22.1%.
CZR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. reported a net income of -62.00M and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BWB and CZR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWB has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to CZR (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWB dropped -59.49% vs CZR's -89.78%.
BWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWB and CZR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer