BWB vs. CZR
BWB (Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc.) and CZR (Caesars Entertainment, Inc.) are both stocks. BWB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while CZR operates in Resorts & Casinos (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, BWB returned 4.34%/yr vs -22.42%/yr for CZR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BWB vs. CZR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWB achieves a 16.60% return, which is significantly lower than CZR's 25.82% return.
BWB
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- 9.19%
- YTD
- 16.60%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 31.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- —
CZR
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 20.42%
- 1Y
- 3.26%
- 3Y*
- -13.33%
- 5Y*
- -22.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
BWB vs. CZR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWB Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. | 16.60% | 29.76% | -0.07% | -23.79% | 0.28% | 41.63% | -9.36% | 30.62% | -16.67% |
CZR Caesars Entertainment, Inc. | 25.82% | -30.01% | -28.71% | 12.69% | -55.52% | 25.93% | 24.53% | 64.71% | -2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWB and CZR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2018 | 0.33 |
The correlation between BWB and CZR shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BWB:
$582.34M
CZR:
$6.00B
BWB:
$1.90
CZR:
-$2.36
BWB:
2.58
CZR:
0.52
BWB:
1.26
CZR:
1.67
BWB:
$224.30M
CZR:
$11.56B
BWB:
$107.29M
CZR:
$3.64B
BWB:
$50.63M
CZR:
$2.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWB vs. CZR — Risk / Return Rank
BWB
CZR
BWB vs. CZR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB) and Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BWB | CZR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 0.08 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.19 | 0.15 | +5.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BWB vs. CZR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWB drawdown since its inception was -59.49%, smaller than the maximum CZR drawdown of -89.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWB and CZR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWB | CZR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.49% | -89.78% | +30.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.62% | -42.43% | +26.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.19% | -69.45% | +47.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.49% | -84.82% | +25.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -75.37% | +75.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.09% | -32.03% | +11.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.17% | 21.73% | -15.56% |
Volatility
BWB vs. CZR - Volatility Comparison
Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) at 2.79%. This indicates that BWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CZR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWB | CZR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 2.79% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.74% | 36.60% | -18.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.52% | 51.04% | -23.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.43% | 52.46% | -20.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.32% | 60.89% | -26.57% |
Dividends
BWB vs. CZR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BWB nor CZR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BWB vs. CZR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. and Caesars Entertainment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BWB and CZR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWB has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to CZR (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWB dropped -59.49% vs CZR's -89.78%.
BWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWB and CZR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer