BWB vs. AVDV
BWB (Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc.) is a stock, while AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Over the past 5 years, BWB returned 1.18%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for AVDV. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BWB vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWB achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.04% return.
BWB
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 23.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.18%
- 10Y*
- —
AVDV
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 44.23%
- 3Y*
- 28.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
BWB vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWB Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. | 5.08% | 29.76% | -0.07% | -23.79% | 0.28% | 41.63% | -9.36% | 15.12% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 16.04% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWB and AVDV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWB vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
BWB
AVDV
BWB vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BWB | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 2.86 | -1.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 3.79 | -2.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.52 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 3.37 | -1.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.23 | 13.67 | -9.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BWB | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 2.86 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.80 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.80 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
BWB vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWB drawdown since its inception was -59.49%, which is greater than AVDV's maximum drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWB and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWB | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.49% | -43.01% | -16.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.62% | -13.19% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.19% | -14.17% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.49% | -28.08% | -31.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.76% | -1.35% | -6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.22% | -6.77% | -13.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.16% | 3.24% | +2.92% |
Volatility
BWB vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 4.92%. This indicates that BWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWB | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 4.92% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.17% | 13.07% | +4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.14% | 15.56% | +11.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.39% | 17.30% | +15.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.36% | 19.73% | +14.63% |
Dividends
BWB vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
BWB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.74% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% |
BWB Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BWB and AVDV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWB has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to AVDV (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWB dropped -59.49% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWB and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer