BWA vs. MOAT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BWA (BorgWarner Inc.) is a stock, while MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Over the past 10 years, BWA returned 11.47%/yr vs 13.40%/yr for MOAT. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

BWA vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWA achieves a 71.86% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, BWA has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 11.47%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.

BWA

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 34.85%
• YTD: 71.86%
• 6M: 78.48%
• 1Y: 143.40%
• 3Y*: 24.69%
• 5Y*: 11.53%
• 10Y*: 11.47%

MOAT

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 3.57%
• YTD: -0.07%
• 6M: -0.05%
• 1Y: 15.51%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: 8.20%
• 10Y*: 13.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWA vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BWA BorgWarner Inc.	71.86%	43.88%	-10.15%	2.50%	-9.18%	18.39%	-9.19%	27.13%	-30.97%	31.24%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-0.07%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	34.79%	-1.28%	23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BWA and MOAT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012	0.59

The correlation between BWA and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BWA vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWA

BWA Risk / Return Rank: 96
BWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BWA Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BWA Martin Ratio Rank: 93

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 30
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWA vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BWA	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.78	1.12	+2.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.12	1.69	+3.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.19	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.06	1.25	+4.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.48	3.90	+12.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BWA vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWA Sharpe Ratio is 3.78, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWA and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BWA	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.78	1.12	+2.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.45	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	0.72	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.78	-0.43

Drawdowns

BWA vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWA drawdown since its inception was -72.15%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWA and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BWA	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.15%	-33.31%	-38.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.80%	-12.43%	-11.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.88%	-21.44%	-24.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.88%	-23.96%	-21.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.59%	-33.31%	-31.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.88%	+3.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.04%	-3.83%	-18.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.74%	3.98%	+4.76%

Volatility

BWA vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 3.86%. This indicates that BWA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BWA	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.08%	3.86%	+9.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.73%	9.88%	+21.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.18%	13.85%	+24.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.06%	18.18%	+15.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.83%	18.68%	+16.15%

Dividends

BWA vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

BWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than MOAT's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BWA BorgWarner Inc.	0.88%	1.24%	1.38%	1.45%	1.69%	1.51%	1.76%	1.57%	1.96%	1.15%	1.34%	1.20%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.36%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BWA and MOAT in my portfolio?

BWA and MOAT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BWA or MOAT?

BWA has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to MOAT (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWA dropped -72.15% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.