PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BWA vs. LIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BWA and LIT is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

BWA vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.18%
8.33%
BWA
LIT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BWA:

0.04

LIT:

-0.14

Sortino Ratio

BWA:

0.27

LIT:

0.03

Omega Ratio

BWA:

1.03

LIT:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

BWA:

0.03

LIT:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

BWA:

0.13

LIT:

-0.36

Ulcer Index

BWA:

9.83%

LIT:

12.47%

Daily Std Dev

BWA:

29.32%

LIT:

32.60%

Max Drawdown

BWA:

-72.15%

LIT:

-62.61%

Current Drawdown

BWA:

-35.65%

LIT:

-54.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWA achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, BWA has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of -2.36%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.06% annualized return.


BWA

YTD

2.93%

1M

2.63%

6M

1.18%

1Y

-0.20%

5Y*

-0.19%

10Y*

-2.36%

LIT

YTD

3.68%

1M

0.60%

6M

5.79%

1Y

-4.40%

5Y*

7.98%

10Y*

8.06%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BWA vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BWA is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BWA is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BWA is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BWA is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BWA is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BWA is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LIT is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LIT is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LIT is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BWA vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BWA, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.04-0.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for BWA, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.27-0.01
The chart of Omega ratio for BWA, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.031.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for BWA, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.03-0.08
The chart of Martin ratio for BWA, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.13-0.42
BWA
LIT

The current BWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is higher than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWA and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.04
-0.16
BWA
LIT

Dividends

BWA vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

BWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than LIT's 0.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BWA
BorgWarner Inc.
1.34%1.38%1.45%1.69%1.51%1.76%1.57%1.96%1.16%1.34%1.20%0.93%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.90%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%

Drawdowns

BWA vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWA drawdown since its inception was -72.15%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWA and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-35.65%
-54.71%
BWA
LIT

Volatility

BWA vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) have volatilities of 6.95% and 6.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.95%
6.66%
BWA
LIT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab