PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWA vs. LIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BWA vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BWA vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWA
BorgWarner Inc.
21.46%43.88%-10.15%2.50%-9.18%18.39%-9.19%27.13%-30.97%31.24%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
14.77%60.05%-19.19%-12.18%-29.91%36.74%127.88%3.27%-28.63%64.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWA achieves a 21.46% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's 14.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BWA has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of 6.72%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.89% annualized return.


BWA

1D
0.57%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
21.46%
6M
24.15%
1Y
93.94%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
6.72%

LIT

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
14.77%
6M
29.65%
1Y
94.01%
3Y*
6.33%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
14.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWA vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWA
BWA Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWA Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
LIT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWA vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWALITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

2.74

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.69

3.31

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.44

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

5.29

-1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.93

20.38

-7.45

BWA vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWA Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWA and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWALITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.74

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.17

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.49

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.24

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between BWA and LIT is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BWA vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

BWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than LIT's 0.42% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWA
BorgWarner Inc.
1.14%1.24%1.38%1.45%1.69%1.51%1.76%1.57%1.96%1.15%1.34%1.20%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.42%0.49%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%

Drawdowns

BWA vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWA drawdown since its inception was -72.15%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWA and LIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BWALITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.15%

-65.91%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.80%

-17.61%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.88%

-65.91%

+20.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.59%

-65.91%

+1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.76%

-19.76%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.10%

-33.90%

+11.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.21%

4.57%

+2.64%

Volatility

BWA vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) have volatilities of 9.56% and 9.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BWALITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

9.75%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.33%

24.73%

+4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.99%

34.53%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.63%

31.66%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.68%

30.50%

+4.18%