PortfoliosLab logo
BWA vs. LIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BWA and LIT is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BWA vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BWA:

-0.34

LIT:

-0.38

Sortino Ratio

BWA:

-0.29

LIT:

-0.49

Omega Ratio

BWA:

0.97

LIT:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

BWA:

-0.22

LIT:

-0.23

Martin Ratio

BWA:

-0.72

LIT:

-0.94

Ulcer Index

BWA:

15.17%

LIT:

15.76%

Daily Std Dev

BWA:

32.13%

LIT:

32.89%

Max Drawdown

BWA:

-72.15%

LIT:

-65.91%

Current Drawdown

BWA:

-34.60%

LIT:

-58.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWA achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's -3.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BWA has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of -3.40%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 5.84% annualized return.


BWA

YTD

4.60%

1M

26.50%

6M

-5.07%

1Y

-10.75%

5Y*

7.90%

10Y*

-3.40%

LIT

YTD

-3.90%

1M

10.43%

6M

-14.30%

1Y

-12.35%

5Y*

10.50%

10Y*

5.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BWA vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BWA is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BWA is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BWA is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BWA is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BWA is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BWA is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LIT is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LIT is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LIT is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LIT is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BWA vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BWA Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is comparable to the LIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWA and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BWA vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

BWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than LIT's 0.97% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BWA
BorgWarner Inc.
1.33%1.38%1.45%1.69%1.51%1.76%1.57%1.96%1.16%1.34%1.20%0.93%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.97%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%

Drawdowns

BWA vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWA drawdown since its inception was -72.15%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWA and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BWA vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 6.22%. This indicates that BWA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...