PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWA vs. ESP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BWA vs. ESP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWA achieves a 42.21% return, which is significantly higher than ESP's 26.64% return. Over the past 10 years, BWA has underperformed ESP with an annualized return of 10.12%, while ESP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.35% annualized return.


BWA

1D
-1.04%
1M
0.35%
6M
35.16%
YTD
42.21%
1Y
72.15%
3Y*
12.58%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
10.12%
ALL TIME*
11.28%

ESP

1D
1.32%
1M
-8.93%
6M
12.89%
YTD
26.64%
1Y
32.22%
3Y*
58.17%
5Y*
34.52%
10Y*
12.35%
ALL TIME*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$127.54M$141.73M$209.78M
$3.40M$4.05M$3.36M

BWA vs. ESP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWA
BorgWarner Inc.
42.21%43.88%-10.15%2.50%-9.18%18.39%-9.19%27.13%-30.97%31.24%
ESP
Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.
26.64%63.34%66.83%35.47%-0.07%-24.87%-7.86%-9.61%11.35%-3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BWA and ESP is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 1993

0.06

The correlation between BWA and ESP shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BWA:

$13.07B

ESP:

$177.27M

EPS

BWA:

$1.70

ESP:

$3.77

PE Ratio

BWA:

37.43

ESP:

15.71

PS Ratio

BWA:

0.95

ESP:

4.00

PB Ratio

BWA:

2.42

ESP:

3.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

BWA:

$14.33B

ESP:

$42.25M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BWA:

$2.71B

ESP:

$15.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

BWA:

$1.88B

ESP:

$11.61M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWA vs. ESP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BWA
BWA Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ESP
ESP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ESP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ESP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESP Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BWA vs. ESP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BWAESPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.17

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

1.37

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

2.60

+4.75

BWA vs. ESP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWA Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the ESP Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWA and ESP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BWA vs. ESP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWA drawdown since its inception was -72.15%, which is greater than ESP's maximum drawdown of -54.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWA and ESP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWAESPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.15%

-54.43%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.80%

-29.09%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.24%

-29.09%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.88%

-33.59%

-12.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.59%

-54.43%

-10.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.25%

-17.72%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.99%

-15.01%

-6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.31%

15.23%

-4.92%

Volatility

BWA vs. ESP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) is 8.18%, while Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that BWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWAESPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.18%

14.32%

-6.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.06%

39.67%

-5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.05%

51.40%

-11.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.36%

43.48%

-9.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.62%

38.37%

-3.75%

Dividends

BWA vs. ESP - Dividend Comparison

BWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than ESP's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWA
BorgWarner Inc.
1.07%1.24%1.38%1.45%1.69%1.51%1.76%1.57%1.96%1.15%1.34%1.20%
ESP
Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.
2.96%3.71%2.90%2.67%0.00%0.00%5.29%4.63%8.03%4.17%3.84%3.88%

Financials

BWA vs. ESP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BorgWarner Inc. and Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BWA vs. ESP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BorgWarner Inc. and Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BWA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BorgWarner Inc. reported a gross profit of 677.00M and revenue of 3.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.2%.

ESP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. reported a gross profit of 4.23M and revenue of 11.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.0%.

BWA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BorgWarner Inc. reported an operating income of 336.00M and revenue of 3.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.

ESP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. reported an operating income of 2.98M and revenue of 11.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

BWA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BorgWarner Inc. reported a net income of 242.00M and revenue of 3.53B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.

ESP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. reported a net income of 2.86M and revenue of 11.42M, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BWA and ESP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESP has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to BWA (8.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWA dropped -72.15% vs ESP's -54.43%.

BWA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWA and ESP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer