BVDAX vs. SHV
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation ETF VI Fund (BVDAX) and iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV).
BVDAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014. SHV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Short Treasury Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007.
Performance
BVDAX vs. SHV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BVDAX vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BVDAX BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation ETF VI Fund | -1.82% | 15.69% | 11.32% | 15.88% | -14.80% | 11.98% | 14.68% | 21.40% | -6.69% | 13.51% |
SHV iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF | 0.82% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 0.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BVDAX achieves a -1.82% return, which is significantly lower than SHV's 0.82% return.
BVDAX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- -1.82%
- 6M
- -0.00%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.26%
- 10Y*
- —
SHV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BVDAX vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BVDAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BVDAX vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank
BVDAX
SHV
BVDAX vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation ETF VI Fund (BVDAX) and iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BVDAX | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 19.52 | -18.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 152.74 | -150.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 54.89 | -53.63 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 441.44 | -439.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 2,481.17 | -2,473.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BVDAX | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 19.52 | -18.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 11.08 | -10.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 7.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 4.44 | -3.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between BVDAX and SHV is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BVDAX vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison
BVDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than SHV's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BVDAX BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation ETF VI Fund | 6.40% | 6.28% | 8.43% | 2.01% | 2.23% | 9.51% | 1.69% | 2.94% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHV iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF | 3.93% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
BVDAX vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BVDAX drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVDAX and SHV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BVDAX | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.25% | -0.45% | -21.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -0.01% | -7.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.57% | -0.42% | -20.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | 0.00% | -5.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -0.03% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 0.00% | +1.81% |
Volatility
BVDAX vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation ETF VI Fund (BVDAX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that BVDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BVDAX | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 0.05% | +4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.87% | 0.13% | +6.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 0.21% | +11.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 0.29% | +11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.16% | 0.28% | +11.88% |