PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVDAX vs. SHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BVDAX vs. SHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation ETF VI Fund (BVDAX) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVDAX achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly higher than SHV's 1.42% return.


BVDAX

1D
0.37%
1M
5.09%
YTD
9.76%
6M
10.21%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*

SHV

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
2.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVDAX vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BVDAX
BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation ETF VI Fund
9.76%15.69%11.32%15.88%-14.80%11.98%14.68%21.40%-6.69%13.51%
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
1.42%4.21%5.12%5.04%0.94%-0.10%0.81%2.36%1.72%0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BVDAX and SHV is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVDAX vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BVDAX
BVDAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BVDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BVDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SHV
SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVDAX vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation ETF VI Fund (BVDAX) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BVDAXSHVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-145.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

53.77

-52.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

431.38

-428.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

2,419.80

-2,405.47

BVDAX vs. SHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is lower than the SHV Sharpe Ratio of 19.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVDAX and SHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BVDAXSHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

19.49

-17.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

11.56

-10.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

4.50

-3.72

Drawdowns

BVDAX vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVDAX drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVDAX and SHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVDAXSHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.25%

-0.45%

-21.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-0.01%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.93%

-0.03%

-15.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.57%

-0.40%

-20.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-0.03%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

0.00%

+1.56%

Volatility

BVDAX vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation ETF VI Fund (BVDAX) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that BVDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVDAXSHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

0.05%

+3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

0.12%

+7.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.97%

0.20%

+8.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.27%

0.29%

+11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.14%

0.28%

+11.86%

BVDAX vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVDAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BVDAX vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison

BVDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than SHV's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BVDAX
BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation ETF VI Fund
5.72%6.28%8.43%2.01%2.23%9.51%1.69%2.94%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.83%4.09%5.02%4.73%1.39%0.00%0.74%2.19%1.66%0.72%0.34%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


BVDAX and SHV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BVDAX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVDAX dropped -22.25% vs SHV's -0.45%.

SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVDAX and SHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer